Force between charged Ring and Rod, disproved Newtons 3rd law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of forces between a charged ring and a charged rod, questioning the validity of Newton's third law. The electric field generated by the ring and the resulting force on the rod are calculated, yielding a specific force value. However, when calculating the electric field due to the rod on the ring, discrepancies arise, leading to the claim of disproving Newton's third law. Participants highlight the importance of symmetry in the electric field components, noting that the radial components cancel out, leaving only the force in the y-direction. Ultimately, the confusion is resolved, affirming that the calculations align with Newton's laws when considering symmetry correctly.
Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
A system consists of a thin charged wire ring of radius ##R## and a very long uniformly charged rod oriented along the axis of the ring, with one of its coinciding with the centre of the ring. the total charge of the ring is equal to ##q##. The charge of the rod(per unit length) is equal to ##\lambda##. Find the interaction force between the ring and the rod
Relevant Equations
##\vec F = q\vec E##
This is the initial setup of the problem:
1638026276093.png

The electric field due to the ring is:
$$E = \int\frac{k(dq)}{(\sqrt{R^2 + x^2})^2}\frac{x}{\sqrt{R^2 + x^2}} = \frac{kqx}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}$$
the force on the rod due to this Electric field produced by the ring is:
Consider a differential element ##dq## of the rod on which the force is:
1638026372669.png

$$dF = E(dq) = E\lambda(dx)\frac{kqx\lambda(dx)}{(x^2 + R^2)^{3/2}}$$
The total force on the rod by the ring will be:
$$F = kq\lambda\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x}{(x^2 + R^2)^{3/2}} dx = -kq\lambda\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + R^2}}\right]_{0}^{\infty}=\frac{kq\lambda}{R} = \frac{q\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}$$
this is the correct answer given in the book. But if we calculate the field due to rod on the ring and then calculate the Force acting on the ring, by Newtons 3rd law we should get the same force

calculating the field due to the rod:
1638026450012.png

$$|d\vec E| = \frac{k(dq)}{(x^2+R^2)}$$
$$d\vec E = dE_x\hat i + dE_y\hat j$$
$$dE_x = dEcos\theta = \frac{k(dq)}{(x^2 + R^2)}\frac{R}{\sqrt{R^2 + x^2}} = \frac{k\lambda(dx)R}{(R^2+x^2)^{3/2}}$$
$$E_x = k\lambda R\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}=\frac{k\lambda}{R} = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0R}$$
$$dE_y = dEsin\theta = k\lambda \frac{x(dx)}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}$$
$$E_y = k\lambda \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}dx = \frac{k\lambda}{R} = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}$$

$$\vec E = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}\hat i + \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}\hat j$$
$$|\vec E| = \frac{\sqrt{2}\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0R}$$
The force on the ring due to the field produced by thr rod is hence:
$$F = qE = \frac{\sqrt{2}q\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0R}$$
so if my math is correct I just disproved Newtons 3rd law :wink: I did the integrals twice by hand and once using wolfram alpha but still haven't been able to catch the error. Can someone help me out. I really hope there is a mistake in the math and not something conceptually wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second drawing is confusing. You have ##dE_x## pointing radially out and then element ##dx## along the wire perpendicular to ##dE_x##. Be consistent. That may be your problem because the component of the electric field in the plane of the ring must integrate to zero by symmetry.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and Hamiltonian
kuruman said:
Your second drawing is confusing. You have ##dE_x## pointing radially out and then element ##dx## along the wire perpendicular to ##dE_x##. Be consistent. That may be your problem because the component of the electric field in the plane of the ring must integrate to zero by symmetry.
The net electric field in the plane of the ring will have both a x and y component because the rod is not infinitely long in both direction, the bottom of the rod is at the center of the ring and the other end tends to infinity(in the +y direction).
Edit: I think I understand where I went wrong thanks a lot! the net force acting on the ring will only be in the y-direction and the x-componet gets canceled out due to the circular symmetry. all that time spent over nothingo:)
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
$$E_y = k\lambda \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}dx = \frac{k\lambda}{R} = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}$$
Everything looks good up until here, although this should be ##E_x## according to your diagram. The only force is in the ##x## direction, as the force in the radial direction cancels out around the ring.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top