Force of an electron with magnetic and electric fields and velocity

AI Thread Summary
An electron with a velocity of 5.90 x 10^6 i is subjected to electric and magnetic fields defined by E = <2.30 x 10^5 i, -2.30 x 10^5 j> and B = <-0.200 k>. The force on the electron is calculated using the equation F = q(E + (v x B)), where q is the charge of the electron, 1.6 x 10^-19. Initial calculations yielded a force vector of <3.68 x 10^-13 i, -1.41 x 10^-13 j>, but discrepancies arose when compared to the expected answer of <-3.68E-14, -1.52E-13>. The discussion highlighted the importance of rigor in vector cross products and the correct application of the right-hand rule.
shadowtracker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron travels with v= 5.90(10)^{6} i through a point in space where E=<2.30 (10)^{5} i, -2.30(10)^{5} j> and B = <-0.200 k>


Homework Equations


F=q(E+(v x B)


The Attempt at a Solution


I did q of the electron equals 1.6(10)^-19 the with v x B = -.2k (5.9)10^6 i= -1.18(10)^6 j getting 1.6(10)^-19<2.3(10)^5 i, -2.3(10)^5 j + -1.18(10)^6 j> = <3.68(10)^-13 i , -1.41(10)^-13>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shadowtracker said:

Homework Statement


An electron travels with v= 5.90(10)^{6} i through a point in space where E=<2.30 (10)^{5} i, -2.30(10)^{5} j> and B = <-0.200 k>

Homework Equations


F=q(E+(v x B)

The Attempt at a Solution


I did q of the electron equals 1.6(10)^-19 the with v x B = -.2k (5.9)10^6 i= -1.18(10)^6 j getting 1.6(10)^-19<2.3(10)^5 i, -2.3(10)^5 j + -1.18(10)^6 j> = <3.68(10)^-13 i , -1.41(10)^-13>

Looks like it's OK.

I would prefer for clarity and of course the opportunity to minimize future problems to have expressed your X product a little more rigorously.

More like <5.9*106 i> X <-.2 k> = <-1.18*106 j> just to keep track of where things came from.
 
Alright i will take that into account on future questions...and i guess i should have clarified that masteringphysics.com said i was incorrect and that the correct answer was <-3.68E-14, -1.52E-13> so I'm wondering what they did to get there.
 
shadowtracker said:
Alright i will take that into account on future questions...and i guess i should have clarified that masteringphysics.com said i was incorrect and that the correct answer was <-3.68E-14, -1.52E-13> so I'm wondering what they did to get there.

Sorry, I scanned it and didn't calculate it out. I thought the X product was OK. But I had the axes reversed when I did the right hand rule.
I think on closer inspection it's <i> X <-k> = <+j>, not <-j>.

So try ...
-1.6*10-19*(2.3*105 i, (11.8 - 2.3)*105 j)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top