Gravitational potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
A skier can possess multiple values of gravitational potential energy simultaneously due to varying reference points. When descending a hill, the skier's potential energy is relative to the bottom, while airborne, the height above the ground contributes a different potential energy value. The concept of gravitational potential energy hinges on the difference between the skier's current position and a chosen reference position. Therefore, at any moment, the skier's potential energy can be calculated based on both their height on the slope and their elevation while airborne. Understanding these varying reference points clarifies how a skier can have more than one value for gravitational potential energy at any given time.
Plasm47
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Explain how a skier can have more than one value for gravitational potential energy at anyone time?

My attempt at an answer.

Consider the position of the skier is relative to the bottom of the hill. Therefore the skier has gravitational potential energy as he/she descends down the hill. At any moment where the skier is airborne (i.e ascending off a jump) he/she now has gravitational potential energy from being above ground.

will not be surprised if this is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Plasm47 said:
Explain how a skier can have more than one value for gravitational potential energy at anyone time?
What determines gravitational potential energy? Think of gravitational potential energy of the skier as a potential energy difference between two positions: its present position and some other position.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
What determines gravitational potential energy? Think of gravitational potential energy of the skier as a potential energy difference between two positions: its present position and some other position.

AM

wouldn't my two first sentences be an example of that? so that would make one value. i guess my last sentence is just an extension to the first value.
 
Plasm47 said:
wouldn't my two first sentences be an example of that? so that would make one value. i guess my last sentence is just an extension to the first value.
Your answer is not incorrect but needs a bit more explanation. That would be an example of having two gravitational potential energies at one particular time (ie. when he/she is airborne). What would those energies be? How would the skier have two potential energies at ANY given time (ie. even when he/she is not airborne) as the question asks?

AM
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top