Heat dissipated from electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding a specific equation related to heat dissipation in dielectrics, particularly the relationship between current density and electric field. The equation presented involves a time-averaged dot product of the current density and electric field, with a focus on how conductivity is integrated into the expression. There is confusion regarding the transition from the left-hand side to the right-hand side of the equation, particularly in relation to the role of complex permittivity and the imaginary component representing loss. The participant acknowledges the need for a derivation to clarify these concepts further. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing power loss in dielectric materials due to electric fields.
capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework problem, but I'm having trouble understanding the following equality in a paper I'm reading

Homework Statement


Homework Equations



<br /> \left&lt;\mathbf{j}(\mathbf{r},t)\cdot\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\right&gt;_t = - \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Re}\left[i\omega\frac{\epsilon(\mathbf{r}) - 1}{4\pi}\mathbf{E_0}(\mathbf{r})\mathbf{E_0^*}(\mathbf{r}) \right]<br />
where
<br /> \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t) = \mathrm{Re}\left[\mathbf{E_0}(\mathbf{r})e^{-i\omega t}\right]<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that
<br /> \mathbf{j}(\mathbf{r},t) = \sigma \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t) = i\omega\frac{\epsilon(\mathbf{r}) - 1}{4\pi}\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)<br />
but I'm 100% sure how to get from there to the other expression. Mostly I'm confused about how the conductivity gets inside the Re operator. I'm pretty confused in general about how to take the dot product of such a complicated vector expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're looking at an expression for the amount of power that is heating a dielectric. Since the power is lost to heat, you can define an equivalent ohmic loss, hence the sigma. It's important to note that the permittivity has to be complex as well, and it's the imaginary component that will end up representing a loss.
 
Antiphon said:
You're looking at an expression for the amount of power that is heating a dielectric. Since the power is lost to heat, you can define an equivalent ohmic loss, hence the sigma. It's important to note that the permittivity has to be complex as well, and it's the imaginary component that will end up representing a loss.

I understand that, but I don't know how to get from the LHS in that first equation to the RHS.
 
The j is the time derivative of the polarization vector dP/dt.

If I have time I'll try to do a derivation.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top