Hooke's Law Lab Spring Constant Calculation

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spring constant using Hooke's Law, the formula k=F/x is applied, where F is the force (weight) and x is the extension from the equilibrium position. The user is experiencing varying results for the spring constant despite using this formula, leading to confusion about its consistency. It is confirmed that plotting weight against the change in length (Delta x) should yield a straight line, with the slope representing the spring constant. Discrepancies in results may arise from inaccuracies in measuring the initial length of the spring or the weights used. Accurate measurements and consistent methodology are crucial for obtaining a reliable spring constant.
Abhishekkkk__
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate a spring constant using measurements from a Hooke's Law Apparatus, a spring, and some weights. The weights are hung vertically from the spring and the distance is measured from the equilibrium point of the spring. If I'm solving for k, then k=F/x. I do this for the different lengths of the spring and masses of the weights, and get very different answers for the constant. So here are my questions: 1) Am I even using the right formula? If I'm not, you can go give me the right one. 2) Shouldn't a constant be constant? And help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2018-1-27_17-27-24.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-27_17-27-24.png
    upload_2018-1-27_17-27-24.png
    18.6 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get a straight line if you plot weight versus Delta x?
 
Chestermiller said:
Do you get a straight line if you plot weight versus Delta x?

Yes I do
upload_2018-1-27_19-51-22.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-27_19-51-22.png
    upload_2018-1-27_19-51-22.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 543
So the spring constant is the slope, and maybe you were off a little on the inextended length.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top