How Do I Choose the Right Scale for Modeling Link Lengths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Links Scale
AI Thread Summary
Choosing the right scale for modeling link lengths involves determining a convenient ratio based on the shortest link. A suggested approach is to set the smallest link length, 76.2 mm, as 1 unit, which would scale other links proportionally. The discussion also mentions using a scale of 1 cm for every 50 mm, but clarity on the purpose of the model is essential for accurate scaling. Understanding whether the goal is a drawing or a physical model can influence the scale selection. Ultimately, establishing a clear purpose will guide the choice of scale effectively.
mech-eng
Messages
825
Reaction score
13
hello all. here are link lengths Link 1=177.8, Link 2=228.6, Link 3=76.2, Link 4= 203.2 . I don't know how I can choose a convenient scale for these links.Do you have any idea? For example is it a good approch to choose 1 cm for 50 mm.to what centimeters can I roll the numbers. Link ratios to the shortest are such as 2.667 or 2.333.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why don't choose your scale as the smallest link length? This way you'll have down scaled link lengths as 1 unit, 2.322, 3 and 2.667 units.
 
mech-eng said:
hello all. here are link lengths Link 1=177.8, Link 2=228.6, Link 3=76.2, Link 4= 203.2 . I don't know how I can choose a convenient scale for these links.Do you have any idea? For example is it a good approch to choose 1 cm for 50 mm.to what centimeters can I roll the numbers. Link ratios to the shortest are such as 2.667 or 2.333.

It's not clear what your purpose is. Are you making a drawing? Are you making a model?
 
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what your purpose is. Are you making a drawing? Are you making a model?

I am trying to solve a problem on paper.
 

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Thread 'Dry sump pump issue'

I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Simple lateral vehicle dynamics model
Replies
18
Views
3K
How do I calculate the tension on top of a pole?
Replies
4
Views
2K
How do I select the right motor and gear ratio for a mid-drive e-Bike?
Replies
2
Views
4K
How do I calculate scale weight for testing a scale glider?
Replies
2
Views
12K
I How Can Improbability and Infinitesimal Probabilities Exist in Real Life Events?
3
Replies
147
Views
9K
I Runge-Kutta 4 w/ some sugar on the top: How to do error approximation?
2
Replies
65
Views
6K
I How do cosmologists view loop quantum cosmology?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Stargazing How Do I Choose the Right Optical Lenses for Building a Telescope?
Replies
4
Views
3K
How Can I Calculate Pulse Jet Engine Dimensions Using Air as Oxidizer?
Replies
4
Views
14K
I When and how can I apply Born rigidity condition?
Replies
40
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top