How Do You Design an Automobile Bumper to Absorb Impact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter James22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automobile Design
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing an automobile bumper to absorb impact, focusing on a car weighing 3702 lbs. The user calculates the kinetic energy of the vehicle traveling at 5 mph to be approximately 3091.38 ft-lb. They plan to implement a 6-inch crumple zone and utilize four springs for impact absorption. The user seeks clarification on whether to treat the kinetic energy as double when distributing it across the springs to stop the car effectively. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying dynamics concepts to the project.
James22
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have posted the assignment hand out. The weight of the car will be 3702lbs.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Right now I am overwhelmed with this project, I am not really sure where to start. Here is my thoughts on where to start.

The weight of the car will be 3702lbs. I think I need to find the kinetic energy of the automobile traveling at 5 mi/h. Now knowing the kinetic energy, would the next step be to decide upon the number of springs and their coefficient needed to stop the auto in 3" or slightly more?

Thank you in advance and sorry if this seems elementary. Dynamics related work doesn't come easy to me to say the least.
 

Attachments

  • bumperassignment.JPG
    bumperassignment.JPG
    70.1 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
I worked on this project some more and calculated the kinetic energy as;

E=1/2 mv^2
0.5 x (3702/32.2) x 7.33ft/s^2 = 3091.38 ft-lb

I have chosen to use a 6" crumple zone and 4 springs to absorb the impact.

This is where I run into trouble trying to get my head around the concept.

I know for the spring
U=0.5*k*s^2

where;
k = Spring co-efficient
s = spring displacement


Since I am trying to stop the car in 6" do I have to treat the kinetic energy as double? Then divide it over the 4 springs that I will be using to stop the car?

Thanks,
Kyle
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top