How does static friction do work?

AI Thread Summary
Static friction can indeed do work, contrary to the initial belief that it cannot. The discussion highlights that work is dependent on the reference frame, as illustrated by the example of a box on a conveyor belt. In an inertial frame, static friction causes the box to accelerate and gain kinetic energy, indicating work is done. However, in a non-inertial frame moving with the box, static friction appears to do no work since the box does not accelerate relative to that frame. This nuanced understanding emphasizes the importance of reference frames in physics.
c_programmer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Static friction can never do work on an object.
a. True
b. False

Homework Equations


The answer is False, indicating that static friction can do work.


The Attempt at a Solution


W=fd, when d=0 w=0 regardless of the force.

How does this work? Or is the online homework wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I might have an answer. Imagine a box on top of another, there is a large static friction coefficient between the two boxes and none on the floor. When the bottom box is moved the static friction will cause the box to move, thus doing work. Is this correct?
 
Yes, I thought of the same counter example. However in the reference frame of the contact surface, static friction can't do work.
 
Work always depends on the reference frame.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Work always depends on the reference frame.

Chet

Why does work depend of the reference frame? If we do work isn't it the change of kinetic energy equal for all observers? The velocity vectors may change, of course, but the difference shouldn't for two inertial frames. Is it different for non-inertial frames?
 
VictorH said:
Why does work depend of the reference frame? If we do work isn't it the change of kinetic energy equal for all observers? The velocity vectors may change, of course, but the difference shouldn't for two inertial frames. Is it different for non-inertial frames?
Yes. You hit the nail on the head. Consider the case of a box on a conveyor belt, and the speed of the belt is increasing with time. So the frictional force is causing the box to accelerate, and the box is gaining kinetic energy. Now consider this same situation from the perspective of an accelerating frame of reference that is moving with the box. From this frame of reference, the frictional force is not doing any work, and the box is not accelerating. The frictional force is being balanced by the apparent horizontal body force acting on the box (associated with the acceleration).

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top