How to Expand a Vectorial Function into a Taylor Series?

AI Thread Summary
To expand a vectorial function into a Taylor series, start by defining a function of a single variable, such as g(t) = f(α(s) + t h), where h is a small perturbation. This allows you to apply the standard Taylor series expansion to g(t) to obtain the desired result. After calculating the derivatives, you can apply the Frenet equations to relate the derivatives of the vector function to curvature and torsion. The expansion will yield terms involving the unit tangent, normal, and binormal vectors, leading to the final expression. Understanding this approach will facilitate the demonstration of the proposition regarding the natural parametrization of the arc.
elessar_telkontar
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to demonstrate the following proposition:

Let \vec{\alpha}(s) be a natural parametrization of an arc C. Then:

\vec{\alpha}(s+h)=\vec{\alpha}(s)+\left(h-\frac{\kappa^2h^3}{6}\right)\hat{t}+\frac{1}{2}\left(\kappa h^2+\frac{\left(\partial_s\kappa\right)h^3}{3}\right)\hat{n}+\frac{1}{6}\kappa\tau h^3 \hat{b}+O(h^4)

where \kappa is the curvature, \tau is the torsion, \hat{t} is the unit tangent vector, \hat{b} is the unit binormal vector and \hat{n} is the unit normal vector.

I understand this is demonstrated by expanding \vec{\alpha}(s+h) in Taylor series. However, I don't know how to expand a vectorial function in Taylor series. Obviously, after expanding it's only matter of applying the Frenet ecuations to the derivatives of \vec{\alpha}(s). Then please help me saying:

HOW TO EXPAND THE VECTORIAL FUNCTION IN ORDEN TO GET THE RESULT?.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please try to help me!
 
<br /> f(\vec{a} + \vec{x}) = f(\vec{a}) + (\vec{x} \cdot \nabla)f(\vec{a}) + \frac{1}{2} (\vec{x} \cdot \nabla)^2f(\vec{a}) + \cdots<br />


One way of seeing this is to slice it down into a single-dimensional Taylor series. For example, after selecting \vec{a} and \vec{x}, you can define g(t) = f(\vec{a} + t \vec{x}) which is a function of t alone, and find its Taylor series.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top