How Strong is the Attraction Between Two Humans After Electron Transfer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chukie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attraction Human
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the attraction between two humans after transferring electrons. It involves using the formula F=kQ1Q2/r^2, where the charges Q1 and Q2 are derived from the initial number of electrons in human tissue and the transferred electrons. A key point raised is the importance of recognizing that human tissue has a balanced number of protons, resulting in a net charge of zero before the transfer. After correcting the calculations based on the net charge post-transfer, participants found more reasonable results. The conversation highlights the significance of accurately accounting for initial charges in such calculations.
chukie
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Human tissue contains about 3*10^27 electrons per kg of material. Suppose two humans are located 1370 km apart and each has a mass of 60 kg. We now transfer 5*10^21 electrons from one person to the other. What will be the magnitude of the resulting attraction, rounded to the nearest Newton?

I used the equation F=kQ1Q2/r^2

except I am not sure if I used the right charges.
for Q1, i found it by ((3*10^27)(6)-(5*10^21))(1.6*10^-19)
and Q2: ((3*10^27)(6)+(5*10^21))(1.6*10^-19)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chukie said:
Human tissue contains about 3*10^27 electrons per kg of material. Suppose two humans are located 1370 km apart and each has a mass of 60 kg. We now transfer 5*10^21 electrons from one person to the other. What will be the magnitude of the resulting attraction, rounded to the nearest Newton?

I used the equation F=kQ1Q2/r^2

except I am not sure if I used the right charges.
for Q1, i found it by ((3*10^27)(6)-(5*10^21))(1.6*10^-19)
and Q2: ((3*10^27)(6)+(5*10^21))(1.6*10^-19)
Why are you using 3 x 10^27? Those electrons are balanced by an equal number of protons so there is 0 net charge. You want to find the net charge after the transfer of 5 x 10^21 electrons.

AM
 
oh okay, thanks! the answer i got now is more reasonable =)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top