Integral form of Gauss' Law, Parallel Plate Capacitor

jajay504
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If one were to consider a parallel plate capacitor with a distance d between them connected to a battery and a vacuum space between the plates. Will the integral form of Gauss' Law to any closed surface between the plates that does not cross either plate hold? If not, what in Gauss' Law would prevent this from working?

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that Gauss' law works in cases where there is high degree of symmetry.
I also know that the integral form describes an integration of fields. However, after a function is integrated, a lot of information is lost. A non-zero charge density cannot, under any circumstances, give rise to a an electric field that vanishes everywhere.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a distinction between a Law being valid (ie, "holding" true), and being useful.
Gauss' Law would merely say that there's zero total charge inside the surface ... which we already knew ... there's only vacuum in there, after all.
But since you need to integrate over the whole surface Area, you can't find the flux inward thru the top separately from the flux that leaves out the bottom => so you can't find the surface charge density. It still "works" in the sense that it doesn't lie ("0=0"), but it doesn't "work" in the sense of being useful to solve for E, or σ, or Q ...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top