Integral of solids with linearly decreasing charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total charge in solids with a linearly decreasing charge density, specifically for a rectangular prism and a sphere. The charge density function, ρ(x), is derived from the maximum charge density, λ, and height, h, allowing for integration over the volume. For the rectangular prism, the area function A(x) remains constant, while for the sphere, it varies based on the area of a disc. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the integrals to account for the variable charge density with height. The final expressions for charge can be rearranged to reveal insights related to λ and the volume of the solids.
Aesteus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the total charge embodied in a solid with charge density that decreases linearly with height from a value of λ at the bottom to 0 at the top.
Solve for a rectangular prism and a sphere.

Homework Equations



∫∫∫ρdxdydz
∫∫∫pr^2sinθdrdθd∅

The Attempt at a Solution



For a rectangular prism, I integrated from 0 to x,y for dx,dy and lambda to 0 for dz. I ended up with Q=x*y*ρ*some function of λ. However, something seems off about this approach, because the charge at any x and y varies with height.

I think if I can get the logic behind the prism, I'll be able to understand the sphere, but any other advice would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have an idea?
 
The charge enclosed in an element of height dx is given by \rho(x)A(x)dx where \rho(x) is a function that expresses the volume-charge density at a given height x from the base. A(x) denotes the area function, i.e. the cross-sectional area of a slice taken at height x from the base. x varies from 0 to h, the height of the figure.

Work out an expression for \rho(x) in terms of \lambda, h and x first (easy, since it's a linear relationship) - this applies to both figures. Then it's just a matter of evaluating the integral in each case between the bounds of 0 and h. For the rectangular prism (which is a cuboid), A(x) is a constant. For the sphere, A(x) follows the area of a disc. (For the sphere, h = 2R, where R is the radius).

After you get the final expression, you should be able to rearrange to express it in terms of \lambda and the volume V alone. When you do this, you will discover an interesting insight.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top