It is asking for the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric field strength at point Z, the superposition principle is applied by calculating the electric field contributions from both charges, q1 and q2, independently. The calculations yield E_x = -2.22 x 10^5 N/C from q1 and E_y = 7.99 x 10^5 N/C from q2, resulting in a total electric field E = 5.77 x 10^5 N/C. The direction of the electric field is determined by the nature of the charges, being radially inward for negative charges and outward for positive charges. The confusion seems to stem from the application of different constants, but both approaches ultimately lead to the same result. Understanding the correct application of the formulas and the directionality of the fields is crucial for accurate calculations.
happyknife
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What are the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength at point Z in the following:

Point X, q1 = -2.0 x 10^-5 and it is 60 cm to the left of point Y, q2 = 8.0 x 10^-6, which is 30 cm to the left of Z.

Essentially, this is what it looks like:
X-------Y--Z
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a matter of superposition. Just calculate the E field for each independent of the other charge and add.
 
Bhumble said:
This is a matter of superposition. Just calculate the E field for each independent of the other charge and add.

I did, but I'm not not getting the correct answer, which should be 5.8 x 10^5. I'm not sure how they got that, which is what I'm essentially asking for: The process. I end up having to add -222 222.2222 + 8.0 x 10^5, however it's obviously not going to be the right answer.
 
\oint E \bullet da= \frac{Q_enc}{\epsilon_{0}}

E = \frac{Q_{enc}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^2}E_x = \frac{-2.0x10^-5}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}(0.9)^2} = -2.22x10^5

E_y = \frac{8.0x10^-6}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}(0.3)^2} = 7.99x10^5

E = E_x + E_y = -2.22x10^5 + 7.99x10^5 = 5.77x10^5

Looks like you had the right answer already. Is there a part you don't understand or is this just a slight oversight? And direction is radially inward or outward for a given negative or positive charge. In this case just along whatever you define the axis as.
 
Last edited:
I don't remember using that formula. I've been using the formula Electric field = Cq/r^2, C being a constant 9.0 x 10^9.
 
your constant C is equal to k = 1 / 4 pi e0, so the equations are the same..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top