K&K Question 3.5 - Mass and Axle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radarithm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axle Mass
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass connected to a vertical revolving axle by two strings, with the mass and axle revolving at a constant angular velocity. The task includes drawing a force diagram and finding the tensions in the upper and lower strings while considering gravitational effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations governing the forces acting on the mass, including tension components and gravitational forces. There are attempts to derive expressions for the tensions in the strings, with some participants questioning the correctness of their algebra and the signs used in their equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided corrections and suggestions for re-evaluating the equations derived for the tensions. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the tensions and the gravitational force, with some participants expressing confusion over specific algebraic manipulations and the implications of certain assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in calculations and the importance of careful algebraic handling. There is also mention of a hint regarding the relationship between angular velocity and gravitational force, which is being applied in various ways throughout the discussion.

Radarithm
Gold Member
Messages
158
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A mass m is connected to a vertical revolving axle by two strings of length l, each making an angle of 45 degrees with the axle, as shown. Both the axle and mass are revolving with constant angular velocity ω. Gravity is directed downward.

(a) Draw a clear force diagram for m
(b) Find the tension in the upper string, T_{up} and the tension in the lower string, T_{low}.

Homework Equations



ma=mr\omega^2=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}
Where phi is 45 degrees.

The Attempt at a Solution



Image: http://gyazo.com/8626cda317d6dca7dc1bbe751b643247
FBD: http://postimg.org/image/tez986p19/

The equations for the x and y directions, respectively:
T_u\sin{\varphi}-T_d\sin{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}
T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}

Solving for the tension in the upper cord, I get this:
T_u=-mg

Assuming that the tangent of 45 is 1. Am I on the right track or am I making a mistake right now? If it has to do with reference frames, I wouldn't know what to do; I know that:
F_{apparent}=F_{true}+F_{fictitious}
I don't know how to apply it though. Should I continue solving for the tension in the lower rope, or do I need to correct something?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Radarithm said:
T_u\sin{\varphi}-T_d\sin{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}
Check the signs
T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}
Check the term on the right hand side. Is this a cut-and-paste error?
 
haruspex said:
Check the signs
Check the term on the right hand side. Is this a cut-and-paste error?

You're right. Fixed it and got the equation:
T_u=\frac{m\sin{\varphi}(\ell\omega^2+g)}{1+\sin{\varphi}}

When I apply this to the hint: If \ell\omega^2=\sqrt{2}g then T_u=\sqrt{2}mg.

All that's left is solving for the other tension. Thanks for the help.
It's funny how easy it is to make dumb mistakes :-p
 
Radarithm said:
You're right. Fixed it and got the equation:
T_u=\frac{m\sin{\varphi}(\ell\omega^2+g)}{1+\sin{\varphi}}

This is not the correct value of tension in the upper string.

Radarithm said:
When I apply this to the hint: If \ell\omega^2=\sqrt{2}g then T_u=\sqrt{2}mg.

If you apply the hint i.e ω2l =√2g in the expression of Tu you have obtained,you get mg not √2mg
 
Tanya Sharma said:
This is not the correct value of tension in the upper string.



If you apply the hint i.e ω2l =√2g in the expression of Tu you have obtained,you get mg not √2mg

In fact I get 2mg when using a calculator. I'm currently working on it. Am I off with the forces or the algebra?
 
Did you fix the errors pointed out by haruspex in post#2 ?

If yes ,what are the two equations you get ?
 
I did, and here's what I got:
T_u\sin{\varphi}+T_d\sin{\varphi}=m\ell\omega^2\sin{\varphi}
T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_u\cos{\varphi}=0
 
Radarithm said:
I did, and here's what I got:
T_u\sin{\varphi}+T_d\sin{\varphi}=m\ell\omega^2\sin{\varphi}

Correct

Radarithm said:
T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_u\cos{\varphi}=0

You have denoted both the tensions by Tu .
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Correct
You have denoted both the tensions by Tu .

Sorry, typing error.
So what am I doing wrong here? There is no centripetal acceleration in the y direction, is there? The mass is rotating in a horizontal plane.
 
  • #10
Radarithm said:
Sorry, typing error.

Okay.But what is the correct equation ?
 
  • #11
Tanya Sharma said:
No problem.But what is the correct equation ?

T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=0
 
  • #12
Good .

So now you have got two equations .You just need to be more careful while doing algebra . Go slowly .

Replace sinø and cosø with 1/√2 . What is the value of Tu you get?
 
  • #13
Here it goes:
\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0
T_d=T_u-mg

Substituting T_d into the next equation, we get:
\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_u-mg}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}
Solving for T_u, I finally get the following:
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g)}{2}

I still get the wrong answer which is off by 4.
I've tried another way but I get \sqrt{2}g instead of \sqrt{2}mg
and another substitution also didn't do the trick.
 
  • #14
Radarithm said:
Here it goes:
\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0
T_d=T_u-mg

Please recheck .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #15
Tanya Sharma said:
Please recheck .

I got it:
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}

This is what I get for not practicing. Thanks for the help!
 
  • #16
Radarithm said:
I got it:
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}

This is incorrect.
 
  • #17
Tanya Sharma said:
This is incorrect.

How? I applied the hint using a calculator with the values m = 2 and g = 9.8
I got something around 27.718 which is equal to the root of two times 2 times 9.8.
 
  • #18
I just did this problem last week, and looking at my answer vs. yours, I'm having trouble understanding how you got ##1 + \sqrt{2}## in the denominator. I don't think it's right. Can you show your calculation leading up to the final answer?
 
  • #19
T_u-T_d=\sqrt{2}mg

T_u+T_d=mω^2l

Just add the two equations . What do you get ?
 
  • #20
jbunniii said:
I just did this problem last week, and looking at my answer vs. yours, I'm having trouble understanding how you got ##1 + \sqrt{2}## in the denominator. I don't think it's right. Can you show your calculation leading up to the final answer?

\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0
T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg
\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}
T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2
T_u(1+\sqrt{2})=m(\ell\omega^2+2g)
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}
 
  • #21
Tanya Sharma said:
T_u-T_d=\sqrt{2}mg

T_u+T_d=mω^2l

Just add the two equations . What do you get ?

m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)=0
 
  • #22
Radarithm said:
\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0
T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg
\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}
Agree so far, except on the last line, one of those ##T_d##'s should be ##T_u##.
T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2
How did you get this from the above?
 
  • #23
Radarithm said:
\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0
T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg
\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}
T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2
T_u(1+\sqrt{2})=m(\ell\omega^2+2g)
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}


It should be T_u+T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2
 
  • #24
Radarithm said:
m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)=0

No...that should be 2T_u=m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell).

Now divide both sides of the equation by 2 .You get the value of Tu.
 
  • #25
jbunniii said:
Agree so far, except on the last line, one of those ##T_d##'s should be ##T_u##.

How did you get this from the above?

It was a typo.
And I recognized that dumb mistake (I multiplied the entire thing by the root of 2). It should have went like this:
2T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}
This should be correct.
 
  • #26
Radarithm said:
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}
This should be correct.
I got the same answer, so either we're both right or both wrong. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #27
Radarithm said:
2T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2
T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}
This should be correct.

:thumbs:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K