Kirchhoff's Rule Cap-monster maze

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mastur
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving two electrical circuit problems: the cap-monster maze and the res-monster maze. For the cap-monster maze, the initial calculation of charge was stated as 60 nanoCoulombs, but it was corrected to 15 microCoulombs. In the res-monster maze, the current was initially calculated as 4A, but it was clarified that the correct answer is 2A due to the consideration of the battery's positive sign. Participants engaged in lighthearted banter while correcting each other's calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful analysis in circuit problems.
Mastur
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Well, the attachments says it all, the cap-monster and res-monster maze. I want to know if I made a right decision about my answer.

Cap-monster maze

ξ - q/C = 0

Then q = 60(nano)Coulomb.

Res-monster Maze

1 - ξ2 - ξ3 - ξ4 + IR = 0

I = 4A.

Am I right?
 

Attachments

  • cap-monster.png
    cap-monster.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 1,814
  • res-monster.png
    res-monster.png
    19.6 KB · Views: 1,547
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mastur! :smile:

oooh, they're fun! :biggrin:
Mastur said:
Cap-monster maze

ξ - q/C = 0

Then q = 60(nano)Coulomb.

yes (except for the nano)
Res-monster Maze

1 - ξ2 - ξ3 - ξ4 + IR = 0

nooo :wink:
 
I already got the Res-monster maze.

The problem is the one battery, which will have a positive sign. So the answer is 2A. :)

And what's with Nano? Hmm? But my answer is correct, right?

Naah, I got it. It's MICRO, not NANO, right? hahaha
 
he he he :biggrin:
 
the answer for the cap-monster cage is 15 micro coulombs. don't feel like explainin it cause I am a lazy bum but you should def trust me!
 
garbagesocray

"the answer for the cap-monster cage is 15 micro coulombs. don't feel like explainin it cause I am a lazy bum but you should def trust me!"
You are wrong garbagesocray . Try considering a loop in which there is only the capacitor C and the Battery(s).
Happy Solving :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top