Lagrangian mech.: Action for a particle under constant force

devaluator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find Scl for a particle under constant force f, that is:

L = (m/2)v2 + fx


Homework Equations



S = ∫Ldt

d(∂L/∂q^{.})/dt = ∂L/∂q


The Attempt at a Solution



Apologies if this belongs in the Introductory Physics section. Apologies for terrible formatting.

∂L/∂v = mv
d(mv)/dt = ma

∂L/∂x = f

From the Euler eqn it follows that f = ma... surprise surprise!

This makes the Lagrangian:

L = (m/2)v2 + m.a.x

So when we integrate Ldt over ta and tb the dependencies confuse me... the m.a.x part, which is also f.x., should have the m.a (or f) just taken out of the integral because it's constant over time. On the left hand side m/2 is constant so it can be taken out. This leaves me with

S = m^2 * a/2 ∫ (v^2)xdt

I know this is wrong, but I can't tell you why... even if it's not wrong I have no idea on how to continue because Lagrangian mechanics confuses me on implicit / explicit dependencies. I can't tell what is a function of what and which one can be taken as a constant over dt. I'd appreciate any help since I'm lost on the subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's certainly not true that
$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + max = \frac{m^2a}{2}v^2x.$$ You can't just ignore the rules of algebra.

The Euler-Lagrange equation told you ##m\ddot{x} = f##. From it, you can solve for x(t) and v(t). Then you can find L as a function of t, which you can then integrate.
 
vela said:
It's certainly not true that
$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + max = \frac{m^2a}{2}v^2x.$$ You can't just ignore the rules of algebra.

The Euler-Lagrange equation told you ##m\ddot{x} = f##. From it, you can solve for x(t) and v(t). Then you can find L as a function of t, which you can then integrate.

Whoops, that obviously wasn't correct... i made an algebraic mistake while writing the equations down here.

What I meant was simply taking m/2 out of the first term and ma out of the second term since they should be constant:

S = (m/2) ∫v^2dt + (ma) ∫ xdt.

And can you please provide an example of which equation to use to solve for x(t) and v(t)... the dependencies totally throw me off, and I can't come up with what to use.
 
Solve the differential equation ##m\ddot{x} = f##.
 
Last edited:
Okay... So that produces:

x(t) = t2f/2m + t
v(t) = f.t/m

That makes the Lagrangian

L = (m/2)f2t2/m2 + f (t2f/2m + t)

So this is L as nothing but a function of t (and f is constant)

If we integrate this wrt time over ta-tb that should be the answer?
 
Your expressions for x(t) and v(t) aren't quite correct. You forgot the constant of integration when finding v(t). It should be v(t) = v0 + (f/m)t. Hopefully, you recognize that equation from intro physics. You made the same mistake with x(t). Also, I'm not sure where that lone t came from.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top