Lagrangian of two mass and spring/pulley system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the Lagrangian for a system of two masses connected by a string over a pulley, with one mass on a frictionless table and attached to a spring. Participants clarify the equations of motion, emphasizing the need for separate equations for each mass and the influence of the spring force. The solution involves recognizing that the string's length is a constant, which simplifies the problem. A particular solution for the equation of motion is found to be A = -mg/k, leading to a general solution of x = A(1 - cos(wt)) with the angular frequency w determined as √(k/2m). The collaborative effort highlights the importance of careful differentiation and the correct application of Lagrangian mechanics.
Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Two blocks of equal mass, m, are connected by a light string that passes over a massless pulley. One block hangs below the pulley, while the other sits on a frictionless horizontal table and is attached to a spring of constant k. Let x=0 be the equilibrium position of the block on the table.

a.) Determine the lagrangian of the system.

b.) Determine the equation of motion.

c.) Show that a particular solution of the equation of motion is xp = A. where A is a constant, and determine A. Add this solution to the solution for the homogeneous equation and show that for the initial condition x = x-dot = 0 at t = 0, the full solution is x = A(1 - cos(wt)) and determine w. Recall that for an inhomogeneous differential equation that the solution is the sum of the homogeneous solution, xh, and the particular solution.

Homework Equations


L = T - V

L = ∂L/∂x - d/dt(∂L/∂x-dot) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted part a and b, and I am not really sure if what i got so far is correct. I also don't know how to start for part c. My work is in the attachment
 

Attachments

  • CM HW.jpg
    CM HW.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 1,963
Physics news on Phys.org
I see how you coupled them now. Retraction.
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
Your partial derivative, for one, is off. You should have two separate equations of motion for each mass. Secondly, you have to figure out how the second block is affected by the spring force. Obviously it oscillates, as well as the first mass, because they are connected and to a spring no less.
I used the fact that the string's length is a constant in order to get one generalized coordinate. Is that not correct to do?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
I used the fact that the string's length is a constant in order to get one generalized coordinate. Is that not correct to do?
Okay I got it now check mine out and see where they differ
1479624173542.jpg
 
You were close, I just haven't seen anyone use that constraint on the length of the string opposed to tension but then again you're using the Lagrangian method.
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
You were close, I just haven't seen anyone use that constraint on the length of the string opposed to tension but then again you're using the Lagrangian method.
oh yes I see, i made a careless mistake when taking the derivative. Do you have any hints about how to start part c?
 
Yup. Attempt it first though. I'm assuming you haven't or are rusty at solving differential equations.
 
You can avoid the mgl term by defining x2 suitably.
Check your treatment of the ##\frac d{dt}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot x}## term.
 
haruspex said:
You can avoid the mgl term by defining x2 suitably.
Check your treatment of the ##\frac d{dt}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot x}## term.
Yes i caught my error in taking the derivative. Just to be clear, introducing the "l" for the length of the rope doesn't really affect the answer since it vanishes with the derivative correct?
 
  • #10
Elvis 123456789 said:
Yes i caught my error in taking the derivative. Just to be clear, introducing the "l" for the length of the rope doesn't really affect the answer since it vanishes with the derivative correct?
Yup. Thank you Haruspex-Sama
 
  • #11
RomegaPRogRess said:
Yup. Thank you Haruspex-Sama
Ok so the differential equation is d/dt2(x) + (k/2m)x +g/2 = 0

so for the first part of part c, i just plug in A, and A will be a particular solution if it is A = -mg/k ?
 
  • #12
ok so rewriting the differential equation as
d/dt2(x) + (k/2m)x= -g/2 plugging in A for the particular solution gives A = -mg/k

the homogeneous solution will look like

xh = Bcos(wt + φ)

so the general solution is

x = Bcos(wt + φ) + A

the velocity will be

x-dot = -B*w*sin(wt + φ)

for t = 0

Bcos(φ) + A = 0 and -B*w*sin(φ) = 0 for this to happen φ must be zero

then B = -A

that means that the solution is x = A[ 1 - cos(wt) ] and w2 = k/2m

does this look correct?
 
  • #13
Correct.
 
  • #14
RomegaPRogRess said:
Correct.
thank you.
 
  • #15
Elvis 123456789 said:
thank you.
Anytime and thank you for your work.
 
Back
Top