Magnitude of Force on Q1 with Three Point Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the magnitude of the force on a point charge Q1, given its position relative to two other point charges, q1 and q2. The context is electrostatics, specifically dealing with the interactions between multiple point charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the net force on Q1 by considering the forces exerted by q1 and q2 separately, but expresses uncertainty about the signs of the forces and their directions. Some participants question the reasoning behind the signs assigned to the forces and how they relate to the nature of the charges involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the signs of the forces and the implications of attractive versus repulsive interactions between the charges. There is an exploration of the original poster's calculations, with some guidance offered regarding the interpretation of force directions based on charge types.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion about handling three charges compared to two, indicating a potential gap in understanding the principles of superposition in electrostatics. There is also mention of a teaching method that may influence their reasoning about force directions.

las90
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q1 = -3.00 µC is situated at the origin. Another point charge q2 = 5.00 µC is located at the location x = 1.00 m. If another charge Q1 = 10.0 µC is placed at x = -0.100 m, what is the magnitude of the force on it?


Homework Equations


F=[k(q1)(q2)]/r^2
E=F/Q (I'm not sure if this one is relevant, considering how I have no idea how to do this).



The Attempt at a Solution



For two particles, I did the same thing and it worked. However, when I tried with 3 particles, obviously it didn't give me the right answer or else I wouldn't be here?

F1= [(9x10^9)(10x10^-6)(-3x10^-6)]/(.1^2) = -27 i-hat
F2= [(9x10^9)(10x10^-6)(5x10^-6)]/(1.1^2) = -.37 i-hat
Fnet = -27 i-hat + -.37 i-hat = -27.37 i-hat.

Meaning the magnitude would be 27.37 N, and it would be going in the negative i-hat direction. Of course, that was not the right answer, and I was really hoping for some help because I have no clue what to do.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Just curious how both forces ended up with the same sign?
 
That's pretty interesting actually. I think what I did was that the F1 ended up being negative because of the -3x10^-6 force and because the i-hat is positive for that, so that one stayed the same.

As for F2, I wasn't exactly sure about this one because I have a problem with figuring out when to use - or + but. I figured the i-hat was negative because of a method our teacher taught us. But I'm not really sure if the i-hats even change based on direction because of a previous example he showed us. Having three charges just really throws me off. I feel it shouldn't be much different than two...
 
If you have a + & - sign then the charges are attractive and that means the force is toward the charge that you are figuring the force for.

In this case both q1 and q2 charges affecting the force are located in the + X direction, so a + Force toward those charges (if -) on the Q1 will be positive X.

The opposite is true for the same sign charges. Repulsive force at Q1 will be - X.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K