Measuring Spin - wave function collapse

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
It is my understanding that a measurement of S_z followed by a measurement of S_y will result in a particle which is in an eigenstate of S_y. But it appears that a measurement of say S_y followed by a measurement of S_x results in zero. I see this from a question in which I am asked to find the expectation value of S_x for a particle in an eigenstate of S_y and my result is zero. But for S_z it is non zero.
I don't understand why this is so. Could someone help me understand why we find non zero S_z values but zero S_x values for a partilce in an S_y eigenstate.

Thanks in advance.

B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking a measurement is not the same as finding the expectation value. If you take a measurement of Sx or Sz, you'll always get 1/2 or -1/2 (in units of h-bar). The expectation value is what you'd expect if you took many measurements and averaged the results.
 
vela said:
Taking a measurement is not the same as finding the expectation value. If you take a measurement of Sx or Sz, you'll always get 1/2 or -1/2 (in units of h-bar). The expectation value is what you'd expect if you took many measurements and averaged the results.

Ok. I understand now. Thank you Vela.

It makes sense that the expectation value in the S_z direction is NOT zero even if we are in a quantum state of S_x or S_y since it is the "preferred" direction I suppose, while S_x and S_y should exhibit zero expectation if we are in the S_z eigenstate as they sort of rotate around S_z.
or something like that. cheers.
 
If you're in an eigenstate of Sx, the preferred direction is along the x-axis. You should find the expectation values of Sy and Sz to be zero.

Keep in mind that x, y, and z are just labels we use to keep things straight. There's nothing intrinsically special about the z-axis.
 
vela said:
If you're in an eigenstate of Sx, the preferred direction is along the x-axis. You should find the expectation values of Sy and Sz to be zero.

Keep in mind that x, y, and z are just labels we use to keep things straight. There's nothing intrinsically special about the z-axis.

oh ok. now I think I really do understand. Source of confusion: hypothetical triple stern-gerlach experiment which exhibits that taking a measurement of Sx on an Sz eigenstate beam would produce 2 more beams in eigenstates of Sx. Obviously 2 resulting beams in the up and down eigenstates of Sx still amount to a zero expectation value.

Thanks again Vela, and if your interested in helping me with another unrelated question regarding GR and the cylinder condition that would be great as well : https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=399738

cheers.

B
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top