Mech#3 on 1974 AP "C" Exam -- 2 Blocks Connected by a Spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the period of oscillation for a system of two blocks connected by a spring after one block loses contact with a wall. The initial assumption is that the period T can be calculated using T=2π√M/k, but the provided solution indicates the mass should be halved, resulting in T=2π√M/2k. This discrepancy arises from considering the motion of the center of mass (CM) and how the oscillation of one block affects the other. When analyzing the system from the CM frame, it becomes clear that the forces acting on each block must be accounted for, as they move in opposite directions relative to the CM. Understanding this relationship clarifies why the effective mass in the oscillation formula is 1/2M.
jgebhardt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A system of two blocks (each of mass M) are connected by a spring with spring constant k. The system is shoved to the left against a wall and the spring is compressed a distance D. The block(s) are then released. Determine the period of oscillation for the system when the left-hand block is no longer in contact with the wall.

Homework Equations


T=2π√m/k

The Attempt at a Solution


So my inclination is to say that T=2π√M/k since I assumed we could consider the oscillation of one individual block to be the same as the other. However, I have the solutions provided by the College Board and they indicate that the mass should be 1/2M resulting in T=2π√M/2k. Can someone explain why the mass is halved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Welcome to PF!

What can you say about the motion of the center of mass of the system?

jgebhardt said:
I assumed we could consider the oscillation of one individual block to be the same as the other.
Yes, that's true if you are considering the motion of each mass relative to the center of mass. Except, as one mass moves to the right relative to the CM, then which direction does the other mass move relative to the CM?

If one of the masses changes its distance from the CM by Δx, how much does the spring stretch?
 
Last edited:
OK, so I get that there are multiple reference perspectives but I'm still unclear as to why that affects T since x is not part of the period equation. I understand that x is involved in finding k but since k is given...If I consider on block to be stationary and the other oscillating with respect to the stationary block I still would have a mass of M oscillating.
I hope I'm not being stupid here but I'm still perplexed. Further assistance?
 
You don't want to go the reference frame of one of the blocks since the blocks are accelerating and you would have a noninertial reference frame.

However, once the system loses contact with the wall, the CM reference frame is an inertial frame. So, you can analyze the motion of one of the masses in the CM frame. Does Hooke's law apply to each mass? Keep in mind that if the mass on the right moves Δx to the right, then the mass on the left must move -Δx (to the left). So, how much force acts on the mass on the right when it is displaced Δx from its equilibrium position?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top