Moments of inertia of a rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the moment of inertia (MOI) of a rectangular plate around its diagonal is equal to that around a line parallel to one of its edges through the center. The initial calculation involved dividing the plate into triangles and rectangles, leading to the conclusion that the MOI is the same for both axes due to symmetry. Participants suggest that understanding principal axes can simplify the analysis, emphasizing that any axis in the plane of the square will yield the same MOI. A request for simpler resources on the topic is made, avoiding complex mathematical concepts like determinants and tensors. Ultimately, the symmetry of the square is key to understanding the equality of the moments of inertia.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Show that the moment of inertia of a rectangular plate round it's diagonal, line B-B is equal to the one round a line parallel to one of the edges and passing through the center, line C-C

Homework Equations


Moment of inertia: ##I=mr^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first case, round the diagonal: the MOI of a straight angle and isosceles triangle round one of the 2 identical edges is ##I=\frac{1}{6}ma^2##, and if i divide the plate into 4 such rectangles and calculate MOI it equals the one round line C-C.
But is there an easier way?
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 679
Physics news on Phys.org
Depending on your background knowledge, the symmetry of the square will tell you that they have to be equal.
 
Orodruin said:
Depending on your background knowledge, the symmetry of the square will tell you that they have to be equal.
I have little background knowledge, please hint the subject that i have to study, is it principal axes? as far as i (think) i know i can't know anything about the MOI itself around principal axis, especially if they aren't orthogonal, but i am not sure.
Please guide me to a book or publication that explains this topic, but, if possible, without the complexity of determinants, tensors etc.
 
Last edited:
You can do it with principal axes, but all that is required is noting that an axis through the corners is a linear combination of the axes through the center and the center of the sides, which must have the same moment of inertia due to symmetry.
 
Orodruin said:
all that is required is noting that an axis through the corners is a linear combination of the axes through the center and the center of the sides, which must have the same moment of inertia due to symmetry.
So i just have to know the formula for modifying MOI with the changing of the angle of the axis?
 
If you want to call it a formula, fine. The point is that any axis in the plane of the square has the same moment of inertia because the axes spanning the plane do.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top