Natural frequency calculated theorectically and experimentally

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a spring-mass system where the natural frequency is calculated both theoretically and experimentally. Participants are examining the discrepancies between these two methods of calculation and considering the role of damping in these differences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the methods used to calculate the spring constant and natural frequency, questioning the accuracy of measurements for mass and spring constant. There is also exploration of how damping might influence the results, with some participants suggesting that damping primarily affects amplitude rather than frequency.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the accuracy of measurements and the assumptions made in both theoretical and experimental analyses. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between damping and frequency, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of the differences observed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering whether the spring constant remains constant over the range of deflection and whether the relaxed length of the spring was measured before and after the experiment. There is also a focus on whether the spring constant used in theoretical calculations was derived from experimental data.

balogun
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was given a spring mass system and asked to calculate the natural frequency by theorectical analysis and by using experimental data.

There was a difference between the natural frequency calculated theorectically and experimentally.

I was asked to discuss the difference in results and I wanted to know if damping is the cause for the difference in results .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What was the difference between theoretical and experimental results for natural frequency. Certainly damping would have an effect.

Are the spring constant and mass accurately measured?
 
for the theorectical analysis I was given the length of spring, the mass attached and the length of stretched spring.I used that to calculate spring constant and then calculate frequency.

for the experimental I was given the time for 20 oscllations for five different readings.

Found average time ,diivided by 20 to find period and found inverse of period to find frequency.

I think damping has an effecy but I have read online that damping only affects amplitude of oscillation not the period.
 
The natural frequency is not affected by damping, but the damped frequency can be different. However, the different may not be too different.

http://hypertextbook.com/chaos/41.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda2.html#c2

Is the spring constant actually constant over the range of deflection?

Did one measure the relaxed length (unloaded) of the spring before and after the experiment?

Did one use the spring constant determined from the experiment in the theoretical calculations?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
895
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K