Net electric field of a charged arc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field at the origin due to charged arcs, specifically a quarter circle in the second quadrant. The formula provided by the professor includes a term of 2sin(45°), which raises questions about its derivation and relevance. Participants express confusion about how to set up the integral needed to calculate the electric field and seek clarification on the origin of the sine term. Understanding the direction of the net electric field is emphasized as a crucial step in the derivation process. The conversation highlights the importance of properly setting up the integral to resolve the confusion surrounding the electric field calculation.
Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


So this was a problem worked in class by the professor in class.
Find the net electric field at the origin due to the arcs
upload_2017-2-17_14-44-14.png


Homework Equations


L=2πr/4
λ=q/L
E=kQ/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


So the professor gave the answer using the fromula
Enet1(2sin45°)/(4πε0r1)+λ2(2sin45°)/(4πε0r2)+λ3(2sin45°)/(4πε0r3)

I can understand the formula except for where the 2sin45° comes from. I mean the arc is a quarter circle of 90° in the second quadrant but I am unsure where this term comes from and how it would change if the parameters of the problem were to change.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See if this diagram helps
upload_2017-2-17_15-10-28.png
 
So if U am understanding this correctly then it is the added sine values of the two angles created when drawing the vector for the field?
 
Jrlinton said:
So if U am understanding this correctly then it is the added sine values of the two angles created when drawing the vector for the field?
I'm not following what you are saying here. In order to see why there is a factor of 2sin(45o) in the answer, you need to go through the derivation. This means setting up and evaluating the integral for the net electric field. Are you having trouble setting up the integral?
 
Yes, I am having trouble coming up with the integral.
 
Jrlinton said:
Yes, I am having trouble coming up with the integral.
OK. Show us your attempt at setting up the integral and we can go from there. It helps to first consider the direction of the net electric field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top