Net electric field of a charged arc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field at the origin due to charged arcs, specifically a quarter circle in the second quadrant. The formula provided by the professor includes a term of 2sin(45°), which raises questions about its derivation and relevance. Participants express confusion about how to set up the integral needed to calculate the electric field and seek clarification on the origin of the sine term. Understanding the direction of the net electric field is emphasized as a crucial step in the derivation process. The conversation highlights the importance of properly setting up the integral to resolve the confusion surrounding the electric field calculation.
Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


So this was a problem worked in class by the professor in class.
Find the net electric field at the origin due to the arcs
upload_2017-2-17_14-44-14.png


Homework Equations


L=2πr/4
λ=q/L
E=kQ/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


So the professor gave the answer using the fromula
Enet1(2sin45°)/(4πε0r1)+λ2(2sin45°)/(4πε0r2)+λ3(2sin45°)/(4πε0r3)

I can understand the formula except for where the 2sin45° comes from. I mean the arc is a quarter circle of 90° in the second quadrant but I am unsure where this term comes from and how it would change if the parameters of the problem were to change.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See if this diagram helps
upload_2017-2-17_15-10-28.png
 
So if U am understanding this correctly then it is the added sine values of the two angles created when drawing the vector for the field?
 
Jrlinton said:
So if U am understanding this correctly then it is the added sine values of the two angles created when drawing the vector for the field?
I'm not following what you are saying here. In order to see why there is a factor of 2sin(45o) in the answer, you need to go through the derivation. This means setting up and evaluating the integral for the net electric field. Are you having trouble setting up the integral?
 
Yes, I am having trouble coming up with the integral.
 
Jrlinton said:
Yes, I am having trouble coming up with the integral.
OK. Show us your attempt at setting up the integral and we can go from there. It helps to first consider the direction of the net electric field.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top