Net electrostatic force : four particles form a square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio Q/q for four charged particles arranged in a square, where the net electrostatic force on particles 1 and 3 is zero. Participants clarify that Q and q must have opposite signs for the forces to cancel out, and they emphasize the need to show work in the calculations. One user attempts to derive the forces acting on the particles, considering angles and distances, but struggles with the final ratio. The calculations suggest that Q/q equals 1, but there is confusion about the correctness of this conclusion. The thread highlights the importance of understanding force components and proper mathematical representation in electrostatic problems.
feistytigger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance - I am completely clueless about this one. I thought I had it figured out, but it turns out that I think I don't know where to even start.
Four particles form a square. The charges are q1 = q4 = Q and q2 = q3 = q. What is Q/q if the net electrostatic force on particles 1 and 3 is zero?
hrw7_21-22.gif

See, I thought it would work out to be 1 since I thought q and Q must be the same for the force to be zero. Apparently I am mistaken. So... show me start to finish pretty please? :biggrin:
 

Attachments

  • hrw7_21-22.gif
    hrw7_21-22.gif
    1.3 KB · Views: 519
Physics news on Phys.org
Your right that Q and q have to have oppisite sighns for the forces to cancel out. But you have to show some work first and eaven the we almost never don't give full answers.
Hint: Just draw out the force components and show when the total on each axis is zero.
 
But I thought this was one of those that you don't really do work - it's logic. Say Q is 2. q has to be -2. Q/q=-1? But that's not right either...

I tried figuring it out this way:
The distance from particle 1 to 4 is sqrt(2a^2), so the force there is k(2Q/(sqrt(2a^2)^2) which simplifies to k(Q/a).
The combined forces of 2 and 3 will pull 1 in at a 45 degree angle to 2 or 3, which is the same direction 4 is pushing away at.
So, for 1: F=k(Q*q/a^2), except we have to take the 45 degrees into account, so F=k(2*Q*q*cos(45)/a^2).
Set them equal, and we have:
k(Q/a)=k(2*Q*q*cos(45)/a^2)
Q=2*Q*q*cos(45)/a
q=a/2cos(45)

Then for particle 3:
F=k(2q/(sqrt(2a^2)^2)=k(q/a)
F=k(2*Q*q*cos(45)/a^2)
k(q/a)=k(2*Q*q*cos(45)/a^2)
Q=a/2cos(45)

Q=a/2cos(45)=q, so Q/q is 1. ?
 
feistytigger said:
The distance from particle 1 to 4 is sqrt(2a^2), so the force there is
k(2Q/(sqrt(2a^2)^2)

It should be:
k(Q^2/(sqrt(2a^2)^2).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top