Periodic Motion: Explaining Resolving into Oscillatory Components

AI Thread Summary
Every periodic motion can be resolved into simple oscillatory components using Fourier Series, which allows for the decomposition of complex periodic functions into sums of sine and cosine functions. This mathematical approach enables the analysis of various periodic motions, including the Earth's motion, by deriving equations for the forces involved. By applying Fourier analysis, one can express the periodicity of the Earth's motion as an infinite sum of these basic functions. Simple examples of periodic motion include pendulums and springs, while planetary motion follows Kepler's laws. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing periodic phenomena in physics.
PrincePhoenix
Gold Member
Messages
116
Reaction score
2
According to our textbook "..every periodic motion, however complicated it may be, can always be resolved into simple oscillatory components." Can someone explain this? How can the periodic motion of Earth be resolved into oscillatory components?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey PrincePhoenix,

I believe what your textbook is referring to is the idea of a Fourier Series. The mathematician and physicist derived a method with which it is possible to decompose any periodic function to a sum of basic periodic functions, namely sines and cosines. By manipulating the amplitudes of several (often infinite) sines and cosines, it is possible to construct the desired function.

To learn more about the actual computation of the series, just search the web for Fourier series and harmonic analysis.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierSeries.htmlAs far as the periodic motion of the Earth goes, if you can come up with a clean equation for the forces acting on it, it is possible to derive the periodicity of the Earth's motion. Using Fourier, I assume you would be able to decompose this into a form of an infinite sum of sines and cosines.

Hope this helps a bit!
 
Thanks.
 
Simple periodic motion is usually described as being like the motion of a pendulum in a gravitational field, or Hookes Law for a spring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law
where the restoring force is (nearly) proportional to the displacement from the center.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law
But the planetary motion around the Sun is also periodic, and is described by Kepler's laws.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler's_laws_of_planetary_motion

Bob S
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top