Physics Question about Magnetic Force & parallel wires

AI Thread Summary
A weight-lifter is conducting a physics demonstration by holding an insulated conducting rod while a parallel rod is placed beneath him. The maximum lifting force he can exert is calculated to be 2009N, while the weight of the rod is 98N, leading to a net force of 1911N available for the current. The correct formula for the force between the parallel wires is clarified, and after correcting a calculation error, the maximum current is determined to be 101,349A. It is suggested to express the final answer with appropriate significant figures before submission. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations in physics problems.
tnbstudent
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have a homework question that I am having some trouble with. This is my first post - so be easy on me.

Question:
A weight-lifter is able to hold a barbell with a maximum total mass of 205 kg above his head. A physicist uses him to conduct a classroom demonstration, asking him to hold one insulated conducting rod (without any weights on it) above his head, while a second, very long rod is placed under his feet, parallel to the first rod. The rod that he is "lifting" has a length of 2.00 m and, together with its electrical leads, a mass of 10.0 kg. The rods are separated by a distance of 2.15 m. What is the maximum current that can be passed through the rods, in the same direction, before he is forced to yield? The same amount of current flows through both rods.

I started by using the basic force equation: F=m*a and then the formula for Force of parallel wires: F=μI1I2/2∏r

My answer:
I tried to set the force of what the lifter could lift equal to the force of the wire.
I got 2009N as the force he could lift (2009N=205kg*9.8m/s^2)
Then I found the force of the wire to be 98N (98N=10kg*9.8m/s^2)
Then I subtracted the 98 from 2009 to get 1911N as the force created by the current in the wire
Since I1 and I2 are the same I used 2I and my equation looks like:
1911N = (4∏X10^-7)*(2I)*(2.0m)/(2∏*2.15m)
When I solve I get I=5.14 e ^9
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tnbstudent said:
I have a homework question that I am having some trouble with. This is my first post - so be easy on me.

Question:
A weight-lifter is able to hold a barbell with a maximum total mass of 205 kg above his head. A physicist uses him to conduct a classroom demonstration, asking him to hold one insulated conducting rod (without any weights on it) above his head, while a second, very long rod is placed under his feet, parallel to the first rod. The rod that he is "lifting" has a length of 2.00 m and, together with its electrical leads, a mass of 10.0 kg. The rods are separated by a distance of 2.15 m. What is the maximum current that can be passed through the rods, in the same direction, before he is forced to yield? The same amount of current flows through both rods.

I started by using the basic force equation: F=m*a and then the formula for Force of parallel wires: F=μI1I2/2∏r

My answer:
I tried to set the force of what the lifter could lift equal to the force of the wire.
I got 2009N as the force he could lift (2009N=205kg*9.8m/s^2)
Then I found the force of the wire to be 98N (98N=10kg*9.8m/s^2)
Then I subtracted the 98 from 2009 to get 1911N as the force created by the current in the wire
Since I1 and I2 are the same I used 2I and my equation looks like:
1911N = (4∏X10^-7)*(2I)*(2.0m)/(2∏*2.15m)
When I solve I get I=5.14 e ^9

Your expression: μI1I2/2∏r gives the force per unit length of the parallel wires, not the total force. Check the units --- they should work out to N/m.

Also, since when is I*I = 2*I? :wink:
 
Thanks - I had a typo. I actually have my formula as
F=μ*I1*I2*l/2∏r where l is the length of the wire
Once, I clear up my brain lapse and use I^2 instead of 2I I get 101,349A.
I only have one try at this one, so I'd like to make sure this is right before I submit it

Thanks again for the help
 
tnbstudent said:
Thanks - I had a typo. I actually have my formula as
F=μ*I1*I2*l/2∏r where l is the length of the wire
Once, I clear up my brain lapse and use I^2 instead of 2I I get 101,349A.
I only have one try at this one, so I'd like to make sure this is right before I submit it

Thanks again for the help

That result looks good. You might want to consider expressing your answer using the appropriate significant figures.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top