Plot the lines of the electric field between a small point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field (E) and potential (V) inside and outside a simple plate capacitor, confirming that E equals σ/ε₀ inside and is zero outside, with V being Ed and zero respectively. There is a request for clarification on plotting electric field lines between a small positive point charge and a large negatively charged plate, with initial assumptions about the lines being incorrect. The correct approach involves using the principle of superposition, first drawing the field lines for each charge separately before combining them. Further elaboration is provided on using polar coordinates to analyze the forces acting on the point charge above the charged plate. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the electric field due to an infinite charged plate in this context.
galipop
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I've been asked to complete electric field E and potential V inside and outside of a simple plate capacitor (the plates are infinitely large and the distance between the two plates is d.)

My working is as follows.

Inside the cap-
E = \frac{ \sigma } { \epsilon_{o} }

then potential V=Ed

Outside the cap
E=0
V=0

does this seem to cover the question, or am I missing something?

Also I need to plot the lines of the electric field between a small point charge (+) and a large metal plate (charge -)...
for this I'm guessing the lines of the charge leave the charge going straight to the plate, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see your LaTeX (there's a temporary problem with displaying LaTeX), but for the first part, your result is essentially correct. But the way to go about it would be to start with the electric field due to an infinite charged plate (sheet, wall, whatever).

For (2), your answer is incorrect. This is essentially a superposition problem. First draw the field lines for a single charge. Then draw them for a charged plate. Now combine the two.
 
Thanks for the reply!

Can you expand a bit more on starting with an electric field due to an infinite charged plate?
 
anyone? .
 
Imagine a point charge, q, at height l above the plane that has charge density δ. Take the point directly beneath the point charge as the origin of a polar coordinate system. Use polar coordinates since all points on a circle of radius r will have the same force on q: Their horizontal components cancel and their vertical components add. Taking a ring of radius r and width dr, the total area is 2π rdr so the charge is 2πδr dr. The straight line distance from q to a point on that circle is L= √(l2+ r2) so the vertical component of the total force from that ring is (2qπδ/L2)(l/L)= 2qπδl/L3. Integrate that with respect to r (don't forget that L is not a constant- it depends on r) from r= 0 to r= infinity.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top