Potential Change in a Circuit Diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the potential at point Q given that the potential at point P is 400 V. The user applied Ohm's Law and the principle that the sum of potential changes in a circuit loop must equal zero. They initially calculated the current to be 20 A and then used this value to find the potential at point Q, arriving at 290 V. There is some confusion regarding the relevance of the 400 V potential in their calculations. The solution provided appears to be correct based on the user's calculations.
daimoku
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Potential Change in a Circuit Diagram

Homework Statement


http://personalpages.tds.net/~locowise/test/28_29.gif

If the potential at point P is 400 V, what is the potential at point Q?


Homework Equations


Ohm's Law: deltaV=iR
Probably the fact that the sum of changes in potential in a loop of any circuit must be zero.

The Attempt at a Solution


Not real sure on this problem. I tried this:
150V - 2.0i - 3.0i - 50V = 0V and found i to be 20A.

I'm kind of puzzled and can't seem to relate the material in the textbook to this problem. Where does the 400V potential come into play? Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still not really sure this is the proper way to approach the problem but apparently the solution is correct. Here's what I did:

Used 20A from above.

400V - 50V - 3.0ohms * 20A = 290V
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top