Power from Niagra Falls: 1.2x10^6 kg/s Fall of 50 m

  • Thread starter Thread starter listera
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power generated by water flowing over Niagara Falls at a rate of 1.2x10^6 kg/s and falling 50 meters. The key formula used is P = mgd/t, where m is mass, g is gravitational acceleration, d is distance, and t is time. The calculated power output is approximately 5.886x10^8 Watts, although there is some uncertainty about the accuracy of this result. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the concept of power in physics rather than just memorizing formulas. Ultimately, the problem is resolved with a clearer understanding of the relationship between mass flow rate and power generation.
listera
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me make a connection between kg/s and kgxm^2/s^2?? It's a power problem...
Water flows over a section of Niagra Falls at the rate of 1.2x10^6 kg/s and falls 50 m. How much power is generated by the falling water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you doing #36, because I just solved it, but I'm not sure if its correct. I solved the problem by making P=mgd/t
m=1.2*10^8
g=9.81m/s^2
d=50m
t=1s
Does that make sense?
For my answer, I got 5.886*10^8 W, but again, I'm not sure if its correct, so Good Luck!
 
listera said:
Can someone help me make a connection between kg/s and kgxm^2/s^2?? It's a power problem...
Water flows over a section of Niagra Falls at the rate of 1.2x10^6 kg/s and falls 50 m. How much power is generated by the falling water?

OK, so I was initially a bit lazy in trying to produce an explanation to this problem. However, I see a recurring problem here, and I think I should intervene to make sure this kind of bad habit does not continue. Most students at this level seems to be doing the same thing, and unless it is corrected, and corrected soon, the study of physics will become one mindless, mind-numbing process.

First of all, when you look at a problem, ask yourself "What am I being tested on?" The problem at hand is trying to actually test if you understand the definition of the term "Power", as applied to mechanics. This is the concept that you are being tested on. You only need to understand the definition of the concept to be able to do this problem. You should NOT be memorizing any formulas which may or may not work for this particular case (that is a bad way to learn physics in the first place).

So what is Power? Simply (and at this elementary level) it is defined as the rate of energy loss or gained. So it is the amount of energy per unit time that has been transfered. In SI units, it is the amount of energy in Joules that has been transferred per second. So the units of Power is Watts=Joules/s. So to answer this question, you need to know how much energy is being used up, or given off, in 1 second.

Without having to give you anymore than you need, you should be able to figure out that, if you have a mass m, falling down a distance of y, then it has done a certain amount of gravitational potential energy. Even better, your problem tells you that this is the amount IN ONE SECOND, which is what we need. So this problem is practically solved by itself.

Again, never, ever simply accept a concept in physics without understanding the definition. Always try to make sure you can "say" a concept or an equation in "words", because that is the easiest way to understand and comprehend it without having to memorize a bunch of disjointed information.

Zz.
 
No offense,Zapper,i think the problem is a bit different.She doesn't realize what is given in the text and what fomulas and reasoning to use to get to what she needs...She"s given the flow and the distance and is asked for the power generated by the water's fall.
U might be right,though,maybe the concepts are unclear and then she should proceed with revising them first,then attacking problems.

Anyway,since the problem is simple and u already gave some hints,i'll state the answer:
Power is approximately equal to 5 times 10^{8} Watts.
 
Thanks everyone...I eventually figured it out and i must admit i felt kinda stupid for not knowing it...haha. Ok how did you know it was #36? that's weird!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top