Pressure, temperature and entropy vs. volume graphs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of an ideal monoatomic gas undergoing a series of reversible expansions. Participants analyze how pressure, temperature, and entropy change with volume during isothermal and adiabatic processes. Key points include the understanding that during adiabatic expansion, temperature decreases as internal energy decreases, which is linked to the work done by the gas. There is confusion regarding the graphical representation of temperature and pressure changes, particularly the slopes and characteristics of isothermal versus adiabatic paths. Clarifications emphasize that the temperature is not constant during adiabatic processes, and the pressure decline is steeper in adiabatic expansions compared to isothermal ones.
RJWills
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"In the following a<b<c are finite positive constants. One mole of an ideal monoatomic gas, initially at volume Vi and temperature 1000K, expands to a final volume cVi in 3 reversible steps: (1) isothermal expansion from Vi to aVi (2) adiabatic expansion from aVi to bVi (3) isothermal expansion from bVi to cVi.

b)a) Make careful sketches, approximately to scale, of how i) the pressure ii) the temperature and iii) the entropy evolve with volume.



Homework Equations


pV=nRT,
W = ∫pdV
ΔU= Q-W
W=nRTlnVf/Vi



The Attempt at a Solution



I've come up with these after quite a bit of thinking:

a) i)pV:
pressure.png


ii)Temp v pressure.This doesn't look right to me, but my reasoning is, first step temp stays the same, reversible adiabatic expansion has no ΔQ and again isothermal keeps it the same. Right? The only thing I can think is there's a problem in my understanding of a adiabatic reversible expansion- how does the temp change?!

tempchange.png


Entropy vs Volume
entropychange.png


*Just realized I should have arrows an all isotherms because it's reversible





 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJWills said:
I've come up with these after quite a bit of thinking:

a) i)pV:
pressure.png
The adiabatic path has a greater rate of decline in pressure with decrease in volume than does the isothermal path. So you need to change the second isothermal path.
ii)Temp v pressure.This doesn't look right to me, but my reasoning is, first step temp stays the same, reversible adiabatic expansion has no ΔQ and again isothermal keeps it the same. Right? The only thing I can think is there's a problem in my understanding of a adiabatic reversible expansion- how does the temp change?!
An adiabatic expansion will result in work being done but since there is no heat flow, the work done must be equal to the change in internal energy (use the first law). So internal energy must decrease. For an ideal gas, how is internal energy related to temperature?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
The adiabatic path has a greater rate of decline in pressure with decrease in volume than does the isothermal path. So you need to change the second isothermal path.
An adiabatic expansion will result in work being done but since there is no heat flow, the work done must be equal to the change in internal energy (use the first law). So internal energy must decrease. For an ideal gas, how is internal energy related to temperature?

AM

With the adibatic path do you mean a greater rate of decline in pressure with increase in volume? Or have I misunderstood the concept?

Also with the adiabatic expansion, because U=3/2 nRT, that a decrease in U, would be a result of a decrease in T since R is a constant and n is kept the same? How steep would I expect the slope to be- is it a rapid decrease (looking like your average adiabatic isotherm) or does it have a shallower slope?

Thanks for the help, much appreciated!
 
RJWills said:
With the adibatic path do you mean a greater rate of decline in pressure with increase in volume? Or have I misunderstood the concept?
Yes. That is what I meant to say. Sorry for the confusion.
Also with the adiabatic expansion, because U=3/2 nRT, that a decrease in U, would be a result of a decrease in T since R is a constant and n is kept the same? How steep would I expect the slope to be- is it a rapid decrease (looking like your average adiabatic isotherm) or does it have a shallower slope?
I am not sure that you mean an adiabatic isotherm. That would be a free expansion which is not a quasi-static process. The adiabatic (quasi-static) curve reflects a greater decrease in pressure as volume increases than the isotherm. Just draw the second isotherm like the first, with a shallower negative slope.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Yes. That is what I meant to say. Sorry for the confusion.
I am not sure that you mean an adiabatic isotherm. That would be a free expansion which is not a quasi-static process. The adiabatic (quasi-static) curve reflects a greater decrease in pressure as volume increases than the isotherm. Just draw the second isotherm like the first, with a shallower negative slope.

AM

Sorry to beat the question to death but I'm a bit confused now. So should my Temperature Volume graph should look like the pV graph with a steeper middle isotherm? Or should it have two flat isotherms (1st at 1000K, the second at the decreased T1) with a steep isotherm between the flat parts where isothermal expansion happens :rolleyes:
 
RJWills said:
Sorry to beat the question to death but I'm a bit confused now. So should my Temperature Volume graph should look like the pV graph with a steeper middle isotherm? Or should it have two flat isotherms (1st at 1000K, the second at the decreased T1) with a steep isotherm between the flat parts where isothermal expansion happens :rolleyes:
There is no "middle isotherm". The second (middle) graph is of an adiabatic process - temperature is not constant during this process, as you have already determined.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top