Prove that a capacitor driven by an AC voltage radiates EM

AI Thread Summary
A capacitor driven by AC voltage can radiate electromagnetic (EM) waves due to the oscillation of charges between its plates, creating an oscillating dipole similar to a dipole antenna. While some argue that radiation primarily arises from the connecting wires, the movement of charge in the capacitor itself contributes to the generation of EM fields. However, the extent of radiation depends on the configuration and distance over which charges are accelerated. The discussion highlights that while oscillating dipole fields can radiate, closely spaced capacitors may produce negligible radiation. Ultimately, the ability of a capacitor to radiate EM waves is influenced by the dynamics of charge movement and the physical setup of the circuit.
zhouhao
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When the capacitor driven by DC voltage ##V_0##,it has the electric field distribution ##f(x,y,z)##
When ##V=V_0e^{iwt}##,how to show the EM travel in the space forever like the light?

Homework Equations


##-{\nabla}^2E-u{\epsilon}\frac{{\partial}^2{E}}{{\partial}t^2}=0 (1)##
derived from Maxwell equation.

The Attempt at a Solution


I firstly think ##E(x,y,z,t)=e^{iwt}f(x,y,z)##.But this is not right,since ##f(x,y,z)## makes electric field not travel too long.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A capacitor driven by AC does not radiate as there are no charges (electrons) being accelerated, except in the connecting wires. EM radiation cannot be obtained by just creating electric and magnetic fields. The only case I can think of where a capacitor radiates is where there is a thick dielectric in which charges can be accelerated.
 
tech99 said:
A capacitor driven by AC does not radiate as there are no charges (electrons) being accelerated, except in the connecting wires. EM radiation cannot be obtained by just creating electric and magnetic fields. The only case I can think of where a capacitor radiates is where there is a thick dielectric in which charges can be accelerated.

What? Why would you think there isn't charge being moved on and off the plates of the capacitor? There is a great deal of charge being accelerated and moved back and forth between the plates of a capacitor. Further the charge constitutes an oscillating dipole. The arrangement is very similar to the classic and ubiquitous dipole antenna invented by Heinrich Hertz and used to prove the existence of propagating EM waves.

Also you say EM radiation can't be created simply by creating EM fields. How do you think they are created? I will agree that not all fields radiate, but oscillating dipole fields do. Sloshing charge back and forth between sides of a dipole antenna to create an oscillating dipole field and is how we make radio.
 
  • Like
Likes zhouhao
tech99 said:
A capacitor driven by AC does not radiate as there are no charges (electrons) being accelerated, except in the connecting wires. EM radiation cannot be obtained by just creating electric and magnetic fields. The only case I can think of where a capacitor radiates is where there is a thick dielectric in which charges can be accelerated.
What I want to know is that which apparatus could radiate EM and whether the EM could travel like the light traveling forever in the vacuum space.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
What? Why would you think there isn't charge being moved on and off the plates of the capacitor? There is a great deal of charge being accelerated and moved back and forth between the plates of a capacitor. Further the charge constitutes an oscillating dipole. The arrangement is very similar to the classic and ubiquitous dipole antenna invented by Heinrich Hertz and used to prove the existence of propagating EM waves.

Also you say EM radiation can't be created simply by creating EM fields. How do you think they are created? I will agree that not all fields radiate, but oscillating dipole fields do. Sloshing charge back and forth between sides of a dipole antenna to create an oscillating dipole field and is how we make radio.
Well, I enjoyed reading your reply! I do agree that there is a lot of charge sloshing back and forth on the plates of a capacitor, but any radiation that is happening arises from the conductor and circuit joining them together. This is because to obtain radiation we need to accelerate charges over a significant distance. This was the mechanism of radiation propose by J J Thompson and formalised by J Larmor. If Hertz had shortened his doublet to a small length, then for a given capacitor charge, the radiation would have diminished. With a closely spaced capacitor the radiation would be negligible.
You mention radiation from a dipole, and in this case you will notice that charges are being accelerated over a significant distance. Further, if we increase the strength of the E-field at the end of the dipole by using a thinner conductor, then the radiation is unaltered, so this E-field is evidently not related to radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes zhouhao
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top