Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator problem by substituting the wave function \(\psi = Ne^{-ax^2}\) into the energy eigenvalue equation. The initial attempt led to a quadratic equation that seemed incorrect, prompting further investigation into similar problems. It was concluded that the \(x^2\) terms in the equation must cancel for the eigenfunction to hold true for all \(x\), leading to the determination of the constant \(a\) as \(a = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar}\). This substitution also yielded the corresponding energy eigenvalue of \(E = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}\). The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how terms in the equation must balance for the eigenfunction to be valid.
Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Substitute \psi = Ne^{-ax^2} into the position-space energy eigenvalue equation and determine the value of the constant a that makes this function an eigenfunction. What is the corresponding energy eigenvalue?

Homework Equations


\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \langle x | E \rangle + \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 \langle x| E \rangle = E \langle x | E \rangle

The Attempt at a Solution



So, initially I tried to solve for a by plugging in \psi but I got a nasty quadratic \frac{2 \hbar^2 x^2}{m} a^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{m} a + \left( E - \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 \right) = 0that didn't really seem right. I then did some research and found a similar problem where the book stopped at a similar quadratic equation (the problem was for the first excited state) and said that "the x^2 terms must cancel.

Why is that? I guess I haven't seen the energy eigenstates depend on x before... So I suppose that gives reason to believe that the terms with x will negate each other?

Following that recipe I arrived at the same value of a as they do a = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar} and I also arrive at the expected energy (Since this given psi is of the form of the ground state harmonic oscillator) E = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}.

Thanks for any help with understanding this deeper.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Crush1986 said:
Why is that?
Because that quadratic equation must hold for any value of ##x##.
 
Ok! I think I see. the rest of the terms are constant, so if x varies the zero on the right must still obviously be a 0. Only way this happens is if the two x^2 terms are equal, right?
 
Yes.
 
Thank you so much! That is kind of a subtle thing to notice! Makes total sense now though, thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top