Question about Gauss's law, finding electric field and potential field

applestrudle
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
ztbty9.png


I'm having trouble with the second part b) for this problem.

I used Gauss's Law and for a I got

r<R

E = \frac{{r}^{2}}{4\varepsilon}

and for r>R

E = \frac{{R}^{4}}{4\varepsilon{r}^{2}}

and then

V = \int{E.dr}

from r to infinity right? So

for r>R I got

V = \frac{{R}^{4}}{4\varepsilon r}

but for r<R

I get V = \left[ \frac{{r}^{3}}{12\varepsilon}\right] from infinity to r so I would get infinity which doesn't make sense,

can someone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why from infinity ?
 
BvU said:
Why from infinity ?

because isn't the potential field always the integral of the electric field from r to infinity?

but is it different when you integrate inside the sphere?
 
Yes, to get V at r inside you want the integral V = \int{E.dr} from r to infinity. But you'll need to break this up into an integral from r to R and then from R to infinity. For R to infinity, you can just use your result for outside.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
First find the potential at distance 0< r < R inside the sphere. (Hint: think of shells) Then we know for electrostatic case ##E=-\nabla V##.

For outside the sphere, you were right in using gauss's law.
 
Hint: It's much easier to use the local form of the electrostatic Maxwell equations (as is almost always the case). Here you just can make the ansatz
V(\vec{x})=V(r) \quad \text{with} \quad r=|\vec{x}|
and solve the (now ordinary) differential equation (written in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
\Delta V=-\rho \; \Rightarrow\; \frac{1}{r} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} r} \left [r V(r) \right ] = -\rho(r).
This reduces the problem to two simple integrations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top