Question about tensions in pulley problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elmer Correa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
Understanding tensions in pulley problems hinges on the choice of the free body diagram (FBD) perspective. The direction of tension varies based on whether the focus is on the mass or the pulley, resulting in opposite directional representations for the same tension force. This discrepancy aligns with Newton's third law, where action-reaction pairs have equal magnitudes but opposite directions. Tension is always depicted as pulling away from the system, as ropes can only pull, not push. Clarifying these concepts aids in solving pulley-related problems effectively.
Elmer Correa
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The scenario I'll use specifically is in the attached file. I can understand why the pulley can have two different tensions, one for each side of the pulley, but what I don't get is why the direction of each individual tension reverses direction? For example, in the free body diagram for mass 2, the direction of tension is in the positive y direction while when drawn from the pulley's perspective, it's in the negative y. And how could tension 1 be in the negative x direction when it's the only force that could be pushing mass 1 to the right?
Thanks for any clarification.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pulley.PNG
    pulley.PNG
    4 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
It all depends on what system you choose to draw the FBD for. If your system is the mass on the table, the tension is to the right; if your system is the pulley, then the tension is to the left. Note that the two arrows labeled T1 in the two FBDs have equal magnitudes and opposite directions. They are action-reaction counterparts as required by Newton's third law.
 
kuruman said:
Note that the two arrows labeled T1 in the two FBDs have equal magnitudes and opposite directions. They are action-reaction counterparts as required by Newton's third law.
Could you elaborate on the force pair at play here? And since this is a force pair, is it even accurate to consider both directions of tension 1 or 2 the same force? If so, is this just the result of naming conventions that make problems like these easier to solve?
 
You can pull with a rope but you cannot push with a rope. That's why tensions in FBDs are always directed away from the system in question.
Look at the picture of two persons pulling on a rope shown below. If you ask the person on the left "Which way is the rope pulling on you?", he will say "to the right". If you ask the person on the right the same question, he will say "to the left."
TugOfwar.png


The tension in the FBDs for each man will look like this
FBDs.png
 

Attachments

  • TugOfwar.png
    TugOfwar.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 628
  • FBDs.png
    FBDs.png
    9.2 KB · Views: 580
  • Like
Likes PhanthomJay
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
928
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top