OmCheeto
Gold Member
- 2,471
- 3,327
To be honest, I don't know what the official answer is. But I do know a bit of maths, and a few of the rules, so I decided to be the judge of the answers.zoobyshoe said:I don't think they are. Try creating an 8 from two threes in some other situation and see how accurate your answer is. There's such an obvious implied constraint against that that no one would seriously consider it.
And after my nap, I decided the there are, as you mentioned, some implied constraints.
The last two sentences were obviously added after the fact, and should be ignored completely.
I also decided that the quiz was done with a pencil, so Borek's merger of two 3s seemed legitimate.
The answer I saw was [15] + [11,3] + [3,7]
This is why I called collinsmark a jerk, as I thought it was too big of a hint.
Commas are used as decimal points in Europe, South America, and Western Africa. [ref]
The Ibix & Sophia solution that I considered correct was: [ , ] + [15] + [15]
although they said they were cheating by leaving a box blank.
But the instructions don't tell you to use the numbers, so putting a comma in one of the boxes works fine, IMHO.
I also like the base change solutions, but that might lead to an ungodly number of solutions.
[ 515 ] + [ 715 ] + [ 915 ] = 307
I'm guessing it falls under the pattern:
[ x ] + [ y ] + [ z ] = wbase
where w = 3 * base
The most trivial ones I saw were:
[ 57 ] + [ 57 ] + [ 57 ] = 305
[ 715 ] + [ 715 ] + [ 715 ] = 307
etc, etc.
But I do understand your "implied constraints" now, as, you can be most creative, without them:
