Rate of heat flow by conduction question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of heat loss through a bushwalker's clothing using the formula Rate = (kA(T1-T2))/L. The user is uncertain about whether to convert temperature from degrees Celsius to Kelvin, as this affects the sign of the calculated heat loss rate. It is clarified that the temperature difference remains consistent regardless of the unit used, and a negative value indicates heat flow from the skin to the environment. The concept of negative power is accepted in physics to denote the direction of heat transfer. Ultimately, the user confirms that their calculations align with the principles discussed.
ProgMetal
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a bushwalker wears clothing that is 2.0cm thick with a surface area of 1.9m^2. The material has k = 0.042 WM^-1K^-1. Her skin temperature is 33 degrees C and the ambient temp. is 0 degrees C.

Calculate rate of heat loss through her clothing while she is sitting

Homework Equations



Rate = (kA(T1-T2))/L

where K = conductivity, A = surface area, T1 and T2 = termperature at two faces and L = thickness.

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a fairly straightforward problem, however I am unsure as to whether to convert the degrees Celsius units given as T1 and T2 values into kelvins, which gives me and answer of -960W (is it even possible to have negative Watts?) or to leave them and cancel the kelvin units of K with them in order to obtain an answer in watts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you let T1=ambient temp. and T2=skin temp., then the heat lost rate should be negative, as that means the heat flow goes from the skin to the surrounding, not the other way. If you exchange T1 and T2 (T1=skin temp. and T2=ambient temp.), then the heat lost rate should be positive for the same reason.

EDIT: In the first case, the heat lost rate you calculate = the rate of the heat lost from the surrounding to the skin. Heat actually goes from the skin to the surrounding, so that your result is negative makes sense.
 
ok, so I did the right thing in converting the degrees C into kelvins? and -960W is a realistic ballpark figure?
 
You can convert the temp. into any unit. It doesn't matter, as eventually you still have to take the different T1-T2. The different doesn't depend on whether its unit is K or C.
In practice, nobody says something has negative power. But in the physics context, negative power does make sense. It points out that the heat flow should be the way around. Heat Q can be either positive or negative, then why can't its rate be negative? :wink:
 
I see. Thanks a lot! :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top