Recurrence relation for harmonic oscillator wave functions

squareroot
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
I've been using a recurrence relation from "Adv. in Physics"1966 Nr.57 Vol 15 . The relation is :
Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png

where Rnl are radial harmonic oscillator wave functions of form:

Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png


The problem is that I can't prove the relation above with the form of Rnl given by the author(above). I've been trying to check this using Mathematica. The form in which I need to use this is the following:
Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png


Here, I use the Rnl's as radial wave-functions for neutrons and protons and multiply the first relation with Rprotonnl and integrate over spherical coordinates.(P.S the R's where noted by g's ).

My questions is why would a relation like this only hold if the R's(or g, respectively) are normalized? Should't this relation hold for any radial wavefunctions? Where does the normalization condition comes from?

The above relations are equivalent with let's say

$$ | \alpha \rangle = a |\beta \rangle + b|\gamma \rangle $$

and by multiplying with the bra ## | \alpha \rangle ## to the left one gets

$$ \langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle = a \langle \alpha | \beta \rangle + b \langle \alpha | \gamma \rangle $$

This is kind of my case above, but from my reasoning it should hold with no dependence on the normalization of the functions.

Thank you!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 967
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 713
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 676
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 649
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The associated Laguerre polynomials are not orthogonal for different values of ##l##. It is the angular part that ensures the orthogonality of the wave functions for different ##l##s.
 
I know that. My question was related to the fact that I can check the recurrence relation ONLY if I normalize the Rnl's first. If I try to use the relation with non-normalized wave-functions the relation doesn't hold and I can't understand why the relation doesn't hold. That recurrence relation, from my reasoning, should hold even for non-normalized functions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top