Regarding efficiency of heat engines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of engine efficiency using two different methods: one based on net work done and heat absorbed, and the other using the Carnot efficiency formula. The user reports discrepancies between the results obtained from these two approaches. Participants emphasize the importance of providing complete problem statements and using the Homework Template for clarity. There is a suggestion for the user to share their calculations to facilitate better assistance. The conversation highlights the need for thoroughness in problem-solving to avoid misunderstandings.
Nitin Gupta
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I tried to calculate the efficiency of a engine using the formula :
Efficiency = (Net Work Done) / (Heat absorbed)

And then I tried to calculate the efficiency of respective Carnot engine by two ways :
1) Efficiency = (Net Work Done) / (Heat absorbed)
2) Efficiency = 1 - (Temperature Lowest / Temperature Highest)

But the efficiency I am getting by the two methods different.How is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nitin Gupta said:
I tried to calculate the efficiency of a engine using the formula :
Efficiency = (Net Work Done) / (Heat absorbed)

And then I tried to calculate the efficiency of respective Carnot engine by two ways :
1) Efficiency = (Net Work Done) / (Heat absorbed)
2) Efficiency = 1 - (Temperature Lowest / Temperature Highest)

But the efficiency I am getting by the two methods different.How is this possible?

Beats me.

This is exactly why the PF Rules state that the Homework Template should be filled out completely, so that HW helpers don't have to extract information piece by piece from users.

Please use the HW template and post the complete problem statement you are working on along with your work which has led to an irreconcilable result.
 
  • Like
Likes Nitin Gupta
SteamKing said:
Beats me.

This is exactly why the PF Rules state that the Homework Template should be filled out completely, so that HW helpers don't have to extract information piece by piece from users.

Please use the HW template and post the complete problem statement you are working on along with your work which has led to an irreconcilable result.

Sorry for the extremely late reply...check this out...here is what I attempted...
 
Sorry, it looks like your work didn't make it into your post. :frown:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top