Rotation - Friction on Rolling Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of friction in a rolling sphere, specifically addressing why friction is present even when the lowest point of the sphere has zero velocity. It emphasizes that static friction is necessary to prevent slipping and to provide the torque needed for the sphere to roll without slipping as it accelerates down a slope. Participants express a realization of the concept's simplicity and some frustration with their initial confusion. The importance of friction in maintaining the rolling motion of the sphere is clearly established. Understanding this principle is crucial for solving related physics problems.
cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=33228&stc=1&d=1300471528.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution



The sphere is rolling without sipping, so the lowermost point has 0 velocity ... so why would there be any friction?

I know that if there will be no friction .. sphere will just slide down and not roll but still as i said ... why will there be any friction?
 

Attachments

  • 01229.jpg
    01229.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 533
Physics news on Phys.org
cupid.callin said:
The sphere is rolling without sipping, so the lowermost point has 0 velocity ... so why would there be any friction?
There will be static friction acting at the lowest point. Friction acts to prevent slipping between surfaces--which is exactly what it's doing here. Without friction providing a torque about the center of mass, how could the sphere continue to roll without slipping as it accelerates down the slope?
 
Doc Al said:
There will be static friction acting at the lowest point. Friction acts to prevent slipping between surfaces--which is exactly what it's doing here. Without friction providing a torque about the center of mass, how could the sphere continue to roll without slipping as it accelerates down the slope?

OMG! This was simple ...

I feel like becoming stupider day by day :redface:

Sorry for trouble Doc Al :-p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top