Simple electrostatic fields questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of an electron in a simple electrostatic field created by parallel voltage lines. The user correctly determines the electric field strength as 100 V/m and calculates the acceleration of the electron to be approximately 1.76E13 m/s² using the formula F = Eq = ma. A simplified scenario is also presented, comparing energy gained by the electron when moving between plates at different potentials. The user notes that their friend's calculations yield unrealistically high acceleration values, suggesting a misunderstanding of the physics involved. Overall, the calculations and concepts discussed align with fundamental principles of electrostatics.
lovelyrwwr
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Imagine nine vertical and parallel lines drawn side by side. They represent infinite planes of uniform voltage. The first line has 0 V. The 2nd line has 1 V. The 3rd has 2 V and so on, with the 9th line having 8 V. The distance between each line is 1 cm, which is 0.01 meter.

There is an electron located on the vertical line with 2 V. This electron has a q = -1.6E-19 C and a mass = 9.11E-31 kg.

What will be the acceleration of the electron assuming there are no other forces?

MY SOLUTION
d = 0.01 meter
q = -1.6E-19 C
mass = m =9.11e-31 kg

E = delta V / delta d = 1 V / 0.01 m= 100 V/m

F = Eq = ma
F = (100 V/m)(-1.6E-19 C) = (9.11E-31 kg) a
a = 1.76E13 m/s^2

Is this correct? My friend is getting something like 6.86E50 m/s^2 or 8.68E50 m/s^s.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to use a simplified version of the problem. Consider the case where there is only two plates: the ground plate and the plate at 1 V. The electron is released from the grounded plate and arrives the second plate having gained 1 eV (1.6e-19 J) of energy (electron-volt: literally the energy gained by an electron moving through a potential of 1 V). Note that the actual distance between the plates was irrelevant.

Next consider the same grounded plate, but now the second plate is twice as far away as it used to be and has twice the potential. Therefore, when the electron arrives at that plate its gain in energy will be 2 eV.

That's as far as I will take it. Calculating the value of the potential halfway between the second set of plates might be a good way to figure out the solution.
 
I see nothing wrong with what you did.

As for your friends' computations - looks like the electron will have to shed quite a bit of rest mass before achieving those kinds of acceleration!
 
thank you so much rude man! 1000x hugs :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top