Solve Catenary Problem: Minimize Potential Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubblesAreUs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Catenary
BubblesAreUs
Messages
43
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Suppose we have a rope of length L and total mass M. Suppose we x its ends at points
(xA; yA) and (xB; yB). We want to determine the shape the rope makes, hanging under the
influence of gravity. The rope is motionless, with a shape parametrised by y(x) or equivalently,
x(y), where x denotes the horizontal coordinate and y the vertical one. We are looking for the
shape which minimises the potential energy of the rope.Image below
[/B]
gU615OS.png


Homework Equations



I'm guessing

ds = sqrt ( dx^2 + dy^2) can be used.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Integrate ds over s, and thus it is...

integral ds = S [ from Yb to Ya]

Xb and Xa would be zero as the horizontal length does not change.

As you can see...I'm a bit confused. I don't know how to parametise dx and dy, or can I just use a polar coordinate system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BubblesAreUs said:
Integrate ds over s, and thus it is...
This just gives you the length of the rope, which you know and should impose as a constraint. You need to find an integral that describes the potential energy and minimize it under that constraint.
 
The integral for the potential energy was given as eq(1) of the problem statement. All that is necessary is to minimize that. This is a well known problem, written up in countless places in the literature.

Your guess,

BubblesAreUs said:
ds = sqrt ( dx^2 + dy^2)

was already incorporated in writing eq(1).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top