Solving for a Vector - Resultant Known

  • Thread starter Thread starter math4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resultant Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a vector problem involving an airliner flying with a known airspeed and resultant ground speed. The key challenge is determining the wind's direction and speed using vector analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the x and y components of the vectors and suggest isolating the wind vector for easier calculation. The angle of the wind vector can be found using the inverse tangent function, and the magnitude can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the steps needed to solve the problem effectively.
math4life
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An airliner is flying in the direction North 20 degrees East with an airspeed of 300mph. Its ground speed and true course are 350mph and 30 degrees respectively(RESULTANT). Use a vector analysis to determine the direction and speed of the wind. Include a diagram.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


350mph/30 is the resultant/true course

I setup x components and y components to add below:
x:
300cos(70)+wind[cos(theta)]
y:
and 300sin(70)+wind[sin(theta)]

I don't know how to substitute properly to solve for the two variables theta and wind - which is the mph speed of the wind which is the second vector and not the resultant. Please help this is due tomorrow morning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your angle for the panes airspeed and direction. Also what is each component equal to?
 
I have no idea what I did wrong- please let me know. I don't know what each angle is equal to either.
 
The angles are fine I was having a mad moment. The sum of the components of the wind and the aeroplane will be equal to the component of the resultant vector which you have been given.

Does this help you any more?
 
I reply to Math4life post as a test of my own understanding. I am not a teacher nor am I experienced at explaining or solving maths problems. Below is my response anyway.

The wording of the maths problem was

An airliner is flying in the direction North 20 degrees East with an airspeed of 300mph. Its ground speed and true course are 350mph and 30 degrees respectively(RESULTANT). Use a vector analysis to determine the direction and speed of the wind. Include a diagram.


First, there is a need to change some terms used.

Instead of the term "airspeed " ......I will use the term air velocity.
Instead of the term "ground speed and true course" I will use the term ground velocity.
Instead of the term "wind speed and direction" ...I will use the term wind velocity.


Math4life stated his problem as:

350mph/30 is the resultant/true course

I setup x components and y components to add below:
x:
300cos(70)+wind[cos(theta)]
y:
and 300sin(70)+wind[sin(theta)]

I don't know how to substitute properly to solve for the two variables theta and wind - which is the mph speed of the wind which is the second vector and not the resultant. Please help this is due tomorrow morning.


I made an attempt at getting a solution to this maths problem and it seems Math4life got stuck on formula transposition
(sorry, the proper name for the process escapes me at this point.)

Basically Math4life wrote Rx=Vx+Wx and Ry=Vy+Wy.
(R=ground velocity, V=planes air velocity, W=Wind Velocity, x = x-axis component of)

The unknown vector value W should be on its own. So, subtracting the
x-component or y-component of V from both sides of the equals sign
would be more useful. Math4life would be better off writing
Rx - Vx = Wx and Ry - Vy= Wy.


The angle of the wind velocity can be evaluated as
the reverse tan of (y-component / x-component).
Math4life would have given this angle the label 'theta'.
This gives tha angle of the wind vector from the the x-axis.
The format of the angle will need to be change to N/S degrees E/W form.


The x- and y- components can be put together and the vector magnitude
can be evaluated by W = \sqrt{(Wx^{2}+Wy^{2})}.

Please let me know of any errors and suggestions of better formating.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top