Solving for Charge Distribution on 2 Conducting Spheres & Rod

bobmerhebi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2 conducting spheres with radii 2 & 3m are connected with a conducting rod of thickness 0.1m & length 0.5m. 500C charge is put on the 2m radius sphere.
Find the amount of charge on each sphere & on the rod.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



By conservation of charges: Q1 + Q2 + Q3 = 500 ... (1); Q1 of rod & Q2 & Q3 of 2m & 3m radii spheres respectively.

As charges are uniformly distributed we have: \sigma1 = \sigma2 = \sigma3

so Q1/A1 = Q2/A2 = Q3/A3 ... (2)



here i got stuck & don;t know how to continue. i know that i need to find 3 equations with 3 unkowns & solve the system, but I am not seeing these equation except for (1) & probably i have to use parts of (2).

could someone help please. thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org


you have three equations, (1) and two equations in (2). Q_1/A_1 = Q_2/A_2 and Q_2/A_2 = Q_3/A_3.
 


thx 4 the help
 


bobmerhebi said:
As charges are uniformly distributed we have: \sigma1 = \sigma2 = \sigma3

Can you justify this?
 


coz charges on conductors tend to uniformly distribute them selves. isn't it?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top