Solving Schrödinger Eq. for Harmonic Oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator through specific substitutions. The main substitutions involve replacing x with a scaled variable ξ and applying the chain rule for derivatives. A key point raised is the misunderstanding about the second derivative of ξ, where it was incorrectly assumed to vanish due to the constant factor. Clarification was provided that the derivative operates on a function, and the product rule applies when taking the second derivative. The original poster confirmed understanding after receiving assistance.
Azorspace
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I wonder if someone could help me to arrive at equation 2.56 by performing the substitutions. Please see the attachment

Homework Equations



Please see the attachment for this part. and also for the attempt of a solution.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You don't show your work, so I cannot figure out what you did. This is what I would do. There are two substitutions in the original Schrodinger equation. First replace

x^{2}=\frac{\hbar}{m \omega}\xi^{2}

Secondly, you need to replace the second derivative in x with the second derivative in ξ. Use the chain rule

\frac{d}{dx}=\frac{d \xi}{dx}\frac{d}{d \xi}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\frac{d}{d \xi}

Repeat to get the second derivative and plug in. It should come out as advertised.
 
First, thanks for replying. Well the main question here is why the next happens:

\frac{1}{mw}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}=\frac{d^2\psi}{d\xi^2}[\tex]<br /> <br /> Because if you take the second derivative of xi, you get this:<br /> <br /> \frac{d\xi}{dx}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}[\tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \Rightarrow\frac{d^2\xi}{dx^2}=0[\tex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Because:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; \sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}=constant[\tex]&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; so you can&amp;amp;amp;#039;t get there by taking the second derivative of xi or x.&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; Sorry i don&amp;amp;amp;#039;t know how to make tex to work but i have attached the reply.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I cannot see the pdf yet (pending approval) but the LateX code shows that you think that because

<br /> \frac{d}{dx}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\frac{d}{d \xi}

you think that the second derivative vanishes because

<br /> \sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}= constant

That is not true. Remember that the derivative operates on a function. Let's put one in (I suggest that you do so until you get used to the algebra of operators) and see what happens. From the top

\frac{d \psi}{dx}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\frac{d \psi}{d \xi}

Then taking the derivative with respect to x once more,

\frac{d^{2} \psi}{dx^{2}}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\frac{d}{dx}(\frac{d \psi}{d \xi})=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}}\frac{d}{d \xi}(\frac{d \psi}{d \xi})

Note that when you take the derivative once more, a product rule is implied where only one term in the product is constant. Can you finish it now?
 
Yes, i got it now, thanks for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top