Solving Simple Fluid Problems: Bernoulli's Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Machodog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Bernoulli's equation to determine the velocity of liquid flowing out of a tube at the bottom of a container filled with liquid. The key equation derived is v = √(2gh), which is a result of assuming equal atmospheric pressure at both the top and bottom of the container and negligible surface velocity. The conversation highlights that this scenario is a specific case of Torricelli's Theorem. Participants clarify the assumptions necessary for simplifying the problem, leading to the conclusion that the velocity of the liquid can be calculated using these principles. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving similar fluid dynamics problems.
Machodog
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A container is filled with liquid, density d. The depth of the liquid is h. A narrow, horizontal, tube at the bottom of the container is letting the liquid flow out at a speed v.
The height of the liquid is kept constant.

What is the velocity of the liquid flowing out of the tube?

Homework Equations


Bernoulli's equation:

p + (1/2)dv^2 + dgh = constant

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know how to do this! I know the answer is (2gh)^(1/2), but i don't know why that is, as my textbook has no examples. Could someone please explain how to do these kinds of problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah... this is an example of a special case of the Bernoulli's Equation, known as Torricelli's Theorem.

I will leave the details of the working out of the equation to you, but I'll point out some important aspects you'll need to consider:

1) You may make the assumption that the pressure on top = pressure below = atmospheric pressure, since both the top and the bottom are open surfaces
2) The surface fluid area of the container is very large compared to the area of the bottom. This means you make the approximation that the surface velocity is...
 
Thanks for your reply.
So can we approximate the surface velocity to be zero?

In which case:

<br /> p_{1} + \frac{1}{2} \rho v_{1}^2 + \rho gh = p_{2} + \frac{1}{2} \rho v_{2}^2<br />

But since p_{1} = p_{2} and v_{1}=0 then we get v_{2} = \sqrt{2gh}.
 
Correct, you are absolutely right. Just as an added note, notice that this is also the equation describing the kinematics of the free fall of an object initially at rest.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top