Specific heat capacity of gases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving two rigid vessels containing an ideal gas, where heat is supplied to each vessel, leading to a pressure change reflected in a manometer. Despite the heat input, the book states that the work done (ΔW) is zero because the volume for gas expansion is negligible. Participants express confusion over the assumption that the gas in both vessels remains the same despite differing heat inputs, questioning the clarity of the problem's illustration. The consensus is that the diagram should better represent the conditions affecting gas behavior. The conversation highlights the importance of clear problem statements in physics to avoid misunderstandings.
lavankohsa
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Figure shows two rigid vessels A and B, each of volume 200 cm3 containing an ideal gas (Cv = 12.5 J/mol-K). The vessels are connected to a manometer tube
containing mercury. The pressure in both the vessels is 75 cm of mercury and the temperature is 300 . (b) 5.0 J
of heat is supplied to the gas in the vessel A and 10 J to the gas in the vessel B. Assuming no appreciable transfer of heat from A to B calculate the difference in the heights of mercury in the two sides of the manometer

10dxlog.png

2. Homework Equations


ΔQ=ΔW+ΔU

3. The Attempt at a Solution


I know that when we give heat to both vessel, the pressure will increase. So the mercury column will also move and there will be a difference in the height in two arms . But my book says when we give heat to vessl there of gas in both vessel will be same. So according to my book ΔW=0 for both vessel. But since mercury will move, one gas should expand and other should compress. Please help me .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are assuming that the volume available for expansion and contraction of the gases within the manometer tube is negligible.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes lavankohsa
OK thanks . But they should mention it .
 
lavankohsa said:
OK thanks . But they should mention it .
Yes, they should, since the figure seems to suggest that there is volume available for gas expansion and contraction in the manometer tube. But it obviously is not drawn to scale.

Chet
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top