Spring mass system and Simple harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 300 gm is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 1000 N/m, while a smaller block of 100 gm compresses the spring by 5 cm. The coefficient of static friction between the blocks is 0.2, and the problem involves determining how far the second block moves from its equilibrium position before slipping occurs. The frictional force is calculated using Ff = u*N, and the slipping condition is established when Ff equals the weight of the second block. The calculations suggest that the second block will start to slip at approximately 0.49 cm from the unstretched position of the spring. The discussion emphasizes the importance of free body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on both blocks.
physicsnewb12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass 300 gm is attached to a spring with spring constant 1000 N/m. A smaller block of mass 100 gm is pushed against the first block, compressing the spring 5 cm. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is u = 0.2. The blocks are then released from rest.

How far from its unstretched, equilibrium position is the second block located before it just starts to slip against the first?


Homework Equations



Ff= u*N (N= normal force; u=coefficient of friction)
Fx=N=-k*x
Since x=-0.5 Fx is in positive direction or Fx=N=k*x

The Attempt at a Solution


Ff = u*N = u*k*x
Mass 2 (m_2) will start to slip when Ff = (m_2)*g.
Ff =u*k*x = (m_2)* g
or when x= m_2*g/(u*k) = 0.004905 m or 0.49 cm

Can someone tell me if i did this right?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram for each block.

The normal force will NOT be -kx .
 
physicsnewb12 said:

Homework Statement


A block of mass 300 gm is attached to a spring with spring constant 1000 N/m. A smaller block of mass 100 gm is pushed against the first block, compressing the spring 5 cm. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is u = 0.2. The blocks are then released from rest.

How far from its unstretched, equilibrium position is the second block located before it just starts to slip against the first?


Homework Equations



Ff= u*N (N= normal force; u=coefficient of friction)
Fx=N=-k*x
Since x=-0.5 Fx is in positive direction or Fx=N=k*x

The Attempt at a Solution


Ff = u*N = u*k*x
Mass 2 (m_2) will start to slip when Ff = (m_2)*g.
Ff =u*k*x = (m_2)* g
or when x= m_2*g/(u*k) = 0.004905 m or 0.49 cm

Can someone tell me if i did this right?

For me if not going wrong:

Yup ! your concepts is right.:smile:
 
SammyS said:
Draw a free body diagram for each block.

The normal force will NOT be -kx .

What will the normal force be then?
 
physicsnewb12 said:
What will the normal force be then?

-kx is the force the spring exerts on m1. It's also the net force exerted on the combination of the two blocks if they are in contact.

What is the acceleration of the blocks when they are in contact?

Have you drawn the free body diagrams?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top