Stress generated by a bending moment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in calculating stress generated by bending moments in rectangular versus circular cross sections. It highlights that rectangular sections have a natural coordinate system, making calculations straightforward, while circular sections allow for more flexibility in axis selection, leading to simpler equations. The confusion arises from the different formulas used for each shape, with participants seeking further resources for clarification. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding coordinate systems in stress calculations. Additional study materials were not provided, but users are encouraged to search for relevant resources.
Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Good day all,
I have an issue regarding the theoretical concept regarding the stress generated by the skew bending
in a rectangular cross section for example
RECTANGULAR SECTION.png


the formula used to calculated the stress is
FORMULA1.png


while when it is a circular cross section we have the following formula
EXPLANATION.png


I really can't understand why we use different formulas in the second case (I couldn't understand the given explanations)
many thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • FORMULA1.png
    FORMULA1.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 1,091
  • EXPLANATION.png
    EXPLANATION.png
    27.1 KB · Views: 3,228
  • RECTANGULAR SECTION.png
    RECTANGULAR SECTION.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 1,129
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the case of the rectangle, there is a natural direction for the coordinate axes. You do not have to use those, but if you choose something else then the calculations of the moments get messy.

For the circle, it is clear that you can choose any pair of orthogonal axes. The moments will be the same. So it is convenient to choose axes that are orthogonal to / parallel to the bending moment. That gives the simpler equation found.
You could, again, choose arbitrary axes and use the same equation as for the rectangle, but numerically the answer will be the same.
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle
haruspex said:
In the case of the rectangle, there is a natural direction for the coordinate axes. You do not have to use those, but if you choose something else then the calculations of the moments get messy.

For the circle, it is clear that you can choose any pair of orthogonal axes. The moments will be the same. So it is convenient to choose axes that are orthogonal to / parallel to the bending moment. That gives the simpler equation found.
You could, again, choose arbitrary axes and use the same equation as for the rectangle, but numerically the answer will be the same.
Thanks a lot for your answer, but this point still confuses me, could you please point me out a link where i can study more this particular issue?
many thanks in advance
 
Amaelle said:
Thanks a lot for your answer, but this point still confuses me, could you please point me out a link where i can study more this particular issue?
many thanks in advance
I do not know any links to recommend. There must be lots out there, but you can search them as easily as I can.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top