A Taylor series expansion of functional

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Schwinger-Dyson equation for a real free scalar field in quantum field theory (QFT) using the path integral formalism. The user seeks clarification on the Taylor series expansion of the functional exponential, specifically regarding the expression e^{i S[φ']} and its relation to the path integral. They propose a functional analog of the Taylor series expansion and inquire about the correctness of the differential expression involving functional derivatives. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the terms ε and ε, questioning if they should be treated as the same or if one should be omitted. Recommendations include consulting Mark Srednicki's QFT textbook for further insights.
vishal.ng
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I'm studying QFT in the path integral formalism, and got stuck in deriving the Schwinger Dyson equation for a real free scalar field,
L=½(∂φ)^2 - m^2 φ^2
in the equation,
S[φ]=∫ d4x L[φ]
∫ Dφ e^{i S[φ]} φ(x1) φ(x2) = ∫ Dφ e^{i S[φ']} φ'(x1) φ'(x2)
Particularly, it is in the Taylor series expansion of the functional exponential
e^{i S[φ']}=e^{i S[φ+iα]} . Can anybody please tell me about the expansion? I have searched and haven't found anything quite helpful on the net. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paul Colby said:
##e^x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!}##
I believe that is a power series expansion. The final answer should contain the exponential still since, we have to relate it to the path integral. I have just started learning the functional formalism and I wanted to know whether,
##F[\phi']=F[\phi+\epsilon]=F[\phi]+\epsilon\left.\frac{dF}{d\phi'}\right|_{\phi'=\phi}+O(\epsilon^2)##
Which I believe is the functional analog of the Taylor series expansion, is correct and if the differential is indeed given by,
##\frac{dF}{d\phi'}=\int d^4y \:\varepsilon(y) \frac{\delta F[\phi(x)]}{\delta\phi(y)}##
Should ##\epsilon## and ##\varepsilon## be the same or should one of them be omitted. Or is the formula incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Paul Colby said:
##e^x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!}##
It is not helpful to quote an obvious result with no clarification on how to apply it to the given use case.
 
You should give Mark Srednicki's textbook on QFT a try.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...
Hello everyone, I am trying to calculate the energy loss and straggling of alpha particles with same energy, I used LISE++ to obtain the energy loss in every layer of the materials using Spectrometer Design of LISE++, but I can only calculate the energy-loss straggling layer by layer. Does anyone know the way to obtain the energy-loss straggling caused by every layer? Any help would be appreciated. J.