Friction loss to vertical pipes in a closed system?

AI Thread Summary
In designing closed heating systems, it's important to recognize that elevation loss due to gravity should not be treated the same as friction loss in horizontal pipes. The pressure loss from elevation is significantly greater, approximately 9.8 kPa/m, compared to about 0.15 kPa/m for horizontal piping. However, in a closed circulating system, the elevation loss can often be disregarded since the system recirculates water, effectively balancing the pressure. Proper pump sizing should still account for elevation changes to ensure adequate flow, especially in multi-story applications. Conducting calculations that include both elevation and friction losses can provide clarity on the system's performance.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
So in designing closed systems, mostly heating systems, I realized today that I've probably been doing one thing wrong all these years. In such a system one doesn't take elevation loss due to gravity into account since you "get it back" on the way down. This I've always been aware of, but what I've still been doing is treating the vertical lengths of pipe as if they were horizontal, that is applying to them a friction loss per meter. Can someone just confirm that I can stop doing this? I'll just go back to my corner and be ashamed...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you estimated how much of a pressure difference is involved as a result of the elevation differences, as compared with the frictional losses?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Have you estimated how much of a pressure difference is involved as a result of the elevation differences, as compared with the frictional losses?

Pressure loss due to elevation would be much higher than the major head loss per meter. Elevation loss is just a result of gravity, 9,8 kPa/m in addition to the friction loss, compared to about 0,15 kPa/m in the horizontal piping. But I believe the elevation loss doesn't need to be considered at all in a closed circulating system.
 
What about when you select the fan? Doesn't it need to have enough ooomph to get significant air flow to the upper floor(s)?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What about when you select the fan? Doesn't it need to have enough ooomph to get significant air flow to the upper floor(s)?

It's a central heating system, so there is a water circulation pump, not a fan.
 
TSN79 said:
So in designing closed systems, mostly heating systems, I realized today that I've probably been doing one thing wrong all these years. In such a system one doesn't take elevation loss due to gravity into account since you "get it back" on the way down. This I've always been aware of, but what I've still been doing is treating the vertical lengths of pipe as if they were horizontal, that is applying to them a friction loss per meter. Can someone just confirm that I can stop doing this? I'll just go back to my corner and be ashamed...

Technically you should consider the elevation changes so you can size your pump correctly. I imagine that since it's a closed loop system that is being constantly recirculated that you'll end up with the same answer. Why not just run a couple of hand calcs and do one like you've been doing it and then one that includes the elevations and see what the results tell you?

CS
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top